Proposed data changes ‘threaten’ EU research

The European University Association warns restrictions could cause continent’s scientists to fall behind global rivals

May 1, 2014

Data protection proposals being brought before the European Council of Ministers in June could hamper the continent’s research competitiveness, according to the European University Association.

The goals of the European Union’s €80 billion (£65 billion) research and innovation programme, Horizon 2020, such as tackling societal challenges and developing research infrastructures, could also be hit by the changes, the EUA said in a statement.

The amendments, suggested by the European Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) in October, are designed to tighten the rules that protect personal data. But they also “unintentionally threaten” scientific advances, according to the EUA.

The EUA is urging member states to preserve access to data for use in scientific research at the upcoming meeting of EU justice and home affairs ministers that will discuss LIBE’s proposal.

More than 30 national bodies representing universities across Europe have signed the EUA statement, which follows arguments made by the Wellcome Trust in a petition in January.

The EUA says that the research tools used in the development of personalised medicines could be “severely compromised” by the changes. Also at risk are long-term studies such as the European Social Survey, which monitors social change across the continent, it adds.

The EUA explains that Europe’s universities are increasingly collaborating with organisations in other parts of the world. It calls for specific recognition of the value and need to transfer personal data internationally to maintain the “competitiveness of European research at a global level”.

“The strengthening of international research collaborations between universities is crucial for reaching Horizon 2020 goals and for addressing social challenges,” the statement says.

The European Parliament accepted the proposal that contained LIBE’s changes in March. The new regulation would replace a 1995 data directive, but has yet to be approved by EU ministers.

holly.else@tsleducation.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham