Privy Council warns BIS not to alter ‘sensitive’ word list

Response to consultation says change to company name restrictions could aid bogus institutions

September 12, 2013

Source: Alamy

Red tape, right fit: reform would open door to fraudsters, says Privy Council

Officials from the Privy Council, the Queen’s body of advisers, have rebuked the government over plans to relax restrictions on the use of “university” and other higher education terms in company names, warning that bogus institutions could take advantage.

In February, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills launched a public consultation on business names as part of its Red Tape Challenge to cut bureaucracy.

The government maintains a list of “sensitive” words and expressions (currently numbering 161) for which permission must be granted before they can be used in company names. They include “university”, “polytechnic”, “charter” and “chartered” (many publicly funded universities have Royal Charters).

“Repealing the regulations could simplify and speed up the registration process for all start-up companies,” the BIS consultation says. It notes that under current rules, a pub near a campus wanting to call itself “The University Arms” would have to apply to BIS for permission.

Officials at the Privy Council – which advises the Queen on the granting of Royal Charters and grants university title to public institutions – took exception to BIS’ plans, as shown by consultation responses obtained by Times Higher Education under the Freedom of Information Act. “We were disappointed that the Privy Council Office (PCO) was not consulted directly over the possible deregulation of sensitive names and wish to strongly object to the potential removal of ‘Charter’ and ‘Chartered’ as sensitive words,” says its response.

The PCO submission, written by Ceri King, head of secretariat and senior clerk, adds: “I note that your list of consultees did not include any of the 129 universities in [the] UK, and only included a minority of the 900 or so Chartered bodies.”

To gain university title, institutions must have degree-awarding powers and meet criteria on student numbers and governance.

“University” and “polytechnic” must continue to be protected, the PCO warns. “Without protection it is possible that…an organisation could call itself a university without meeting the criteria, thereby devaluing the title. It would also be much more difficult…to identify and…close down bogus universities.”

BIS is expected to issue its response to the consultation within days. It is thought unlikely that there will be any change to the protections for higher education terms.

A BIS spokesman said: “There are a number of words that quite clearly are very contentious. We’ve obviously borne that in mind.”

john.morgan@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

United Nations peace keeper

Understanding the unwritten rules of graduate study is vital if you want to get the most from your PhD supervision, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

David Parkins Christmas illustration (22 December 2016)

A Dickensian tale, set in today’s university

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration (5 January 2017)

Fixing problems in the academic job market by reducing the number of PhDs would homogenise the sector, argues Tom Cutterham

Houses of Parliament, Westminster, government

There really is no need for the Higher Education and Research Bill, says Anne Sheppard

poi, circus

Kate Riegle van West had to battle to bring her circus life and her academic life together