NUS ‘could do more’ to support protesters

Student leaders criticised over perceived failure to support grass-roots members joining in demonstrations

December 19, 2013

Source: PA Photos

Rallying cry: some protesters at University of London claim NUS is out of touch

Student leaders have denied accusations that they are out of touch with the grass-roots activism that inspired a national day of protest.

Although the National Union of Students endorsed a day of campus demonstrations against alleged attacks by police and university management on the right to protest, there are criticisms that it could do more support the movement.

Several protesters in a 1,000-strong rally outside the University of London carried placards urging the NUS to call a national demonstration against what many believe is a heavy-handed crackdown on student protests.

Others claimed that student groups, such as the National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts, which organised the London rally, had responded more dynamically to the alleged intimidation of university occupations.

But Sebastiaan Debrouwere, president of King’s College London Students’ Union, which voted to support the demonstration, said the NUS had responded well to a situation that “came up on the radar very quickly”.

NUS officers had held an emergency debate on the issue on 5 December, the day after the eviction of students from the University of London’s Senate House, Mr Debrouwere said. “We are supporting the cause but also supporting student unions to take action,” he added.

Claims that the NUS had become too corporate or overly focused on engagement with university management at the expense of defending students’ rights were wrong, he added.

Ellie Williams, vice-president of the University of Bristol Students’ Union, who attended the London demonstration in support of those arrested after the Senate House occupations, said she believed that the NUS had played a major role in the day of action, albeit indirectly.

“A lot of people involved in grass-roots activism have been involved in the NUS,” Ms Williams said.

“If it can help to pass on skills to help people organise safe, peaceful rallies like this, then that’s great,” she argued.

With so many interests represented in the London rally – students held banners in support of the University of London Union, against privatisation and alleged police brutality – the NUS was right to support the march but not take a lead role in it, Ms Williams said.

“Trying to represent all people and all things is not the best use of our resources,” she added.

jack.grove@tsleducation.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham