Nobel Prize in Economics celebrates contract theory

Two scholars at US institutions secure prestigious award              

October 10, 2016

This year’s Nobel Prize in Economics has been awarded for research that looks at how contracts help society to deal with conflicting interests.

Oliver Hart, Andrew E. Furer professor of economics at Harvard University, and Bengt Holmström, Paul A. Samuelson professor of economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, will share the 8 million krona (£745,000) prize.

Professor Hart and Professor Holmström's work to develop new theoretical tools in contract theory has influenced many fields, including corporate governance and constitutional law, said the Swedish Academy.

“The contributions by the laureates have helped us understand many of the contracts we observe in real life. They have also given us new ways of thinking about how contracts should be designed, both in private markets and in the realm of public policy,” it added.

Professor Hart is originally from the UK and Professor Holmström hails from Finland.

holly.else@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Felipe Fernández-Armesto takes issue with a claim that the EU has been playing the sovereignty card in Brexit negotiations

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

John McEnroe arguing with umpire. Tennis

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman explain how to negotiate your annual performance and development review

Man throwing axes

UCU attacks plans to cut 171 posts, but university denies Brexit 'the reason'

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald