MPs call for major research funding boost

A group of MPs has called on the government to ensure 3 per cent of GDP is invested in research and development by 2020 or risk the UK falling behind

December 1, 2014

The House of Commons Business, Innovation and Skills committee said that 30 years of underinvestment had made the UK one of the least research-intensive economies of all advanced industrial nations.

It added that funding for science and innovation should be maintained or improved in the next spending review to ensure that the potential of the science base is not “throttled”.

Not enough is being done to harness the potential economic benefits of the university research base, according to the committee’s report Business-University Collaboration.

Adrian Bailey, chair of the committee, said: “Other countries, such as Germany, seem to get more value from their scientific activity than the UK.

“The government needs to do more to bring businesses and universities together to realise the benefits of the cutting-edge research taking place across the country.”

Mr Bailey said that in 1979 the UK was one of the most research-intensive economies in the world and now – among advanced industrial economies – it is one of the least.

“If the UK is going to punch its weight in the global economy, and help our businesses succeed in international markets, the government needs to bridge this structural gap in research and development funding,” he added.

In 2012 the government invested 1.72 per cent of GDP on research and development, which is significantly less than other countries with similar economies, the committee says. The US, for example, spends 2.80 per cent of GDP on research and development each year, Germany 2.84 per cent and France 2.25 per cent.

Mr Bailey said: “To ensure the economic potential of our science base isn’t throttled, we call on the government to protect the science budget in the next spending review.”

He added that the government should use the Science and Innovation Strategy, due to be published later this year, to set out its plans for the innovation system and “articulate an ambitious vision for this sector”.

The report also calls for the introduction of an impartial method to monitor its progress at boosting research and development activity.

holly.else@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Worried man wiping forehead
Two academics explain how to beat some of the typical anxieties associated with a doctoral degree

Felipe Fernández-Armesto takes issue with a claim that the EU has been playing the sovereignty card in Brexit negotiations

A group of flamingos and a Marabou stork

A right-wing philosopher in Texas tells John Gill how a minority of students can shut down debates and intimidate lecturers – and why he backs Trump

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate

Kenny Dalglish

Agnes Bäker and Amanda Goodall have found that academics who are happiest at work have a head of department who is a distinguished researcher. How can such people be encouraged into management?