MP: politicians must understand ‘scientific’ policymaking

Adam Afriyie urges policymakers to test their preconceived ideologies against evidence

November 9, 2015

Politicians must understand how to use a “scientific approach” to policymaking rather than relying on “ideological” or “tribal” intuitions, according to a former shadow science minister.

Adam Afriyie, who became Conservative MP for Windsor in 2005 after a career in information technology, said that his “whole world changed” upon entering Parliament.

“I suddenly began to realise that the way politics works is not quite the same as how science works, or technology works – or even how sound reason or straight lines work,” Mr Afriyie told a conference in London on Parliament and academic research on 2 November.

Mr Afriyie is the chairman of the Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, which offers MPs peer-reviewed briefings on scientific issues.  

He said that it was crucial that politicians understood the “scientific approach” to policymaking.

Rather than simply relying on their preconceived ideas, politicians needed to say to themselves: “I believe it should be that way, but let me set this up as an idea, and let me test it against the evidence”, Mr Afriyie argued.

“I think it’s really important that politicians understand that approach to politics and policymaking as well as the ideological, tribal approach, which, sadly, becomes necessary at times,” he added.

Mr Afriyie was shadow science and innovation minister from 2007 to 2010, during which he attracted controversy for saying that ministers should be able to dismiss scientific advisers “even if they just don’t like them”.

His comments followed the sacking of scientist David Nutt from his position of head of the UK Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs after he criticised the government’s decision to reclassify cannabis from grade C to grade B.

Another speaker at “Research Impact and Parliament” was Jane Elliott, chief executive of the Economic and Social Research Council.

She questioned whether “evidence-based policy” was an appropriate term.

Professor Elliott quoted the US political scientist Kenneth Prewitt, who has argued that many other non-scientific factors such as personal experiences, political beliefs and so on also have an impact on policymaking, leading him to suggest that “evidence-influenced politics” might be a better term.

david.matthews@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Politicians should take ‘scientific’ path to policy

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Researcher in Fluid Dynamics

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Analyst

Greenwich School Of Management Ltd

PhD Research Fellow in Medical Physics

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Postdoctoral position in Atmospheric and Space Physics

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

PhD Fellow in Machine Learning

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu
See all jobs

Most Commented

Doctoral study can seem like a 24-7 endeavour, but don't ignore these other opportunities, advise Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman

Matthew Brazier illustration (9 February 2017)

How do you defeat Nazis and liars? Focus on the people in earshot, says eminent Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt

Improvement, performance, rankings, success

Phil Baty sets out why the World University Rankings are here to stay – and why that's a good thing

Warwick vice-chancellor Stuart Croft on why his university reluctantly joined the ‘flawed’ teaching excellence framework

people dressed in game of thrones costume

Old Germanic languages are back in vogue, but what value are they to a modern-day graduate? Alice Durrans writes