Moving university ‘increases research output and impact’

But transferring to an institution in another country generally has less of a ‘positive impact’, finds paper

June 20, 2016
Removal men loading home contents into truck
Source: Alamy

Academics looking to increase their publication output and impact should consider moving university, according to the findings of a recent paper.

The study, “Does research mobility have an effect on productivity and impact?”, published in International Higher Education, found that researchers who have worked in at least two institutions generally publish more research and are more frequently cited.

The research collected data on the number of publications and citations for 700 top-producing researchers across seven disciplines between 2010 and 2015, in addition to their university and country affiliations, using Elsevier’s SciVal database. The subjects included neuroscience, mechanical engineering, arts and humanities, oncology, environmental geology, business and infectious diseases.

The study found that academics in mechanical engineering, arts and humanities, oncology and infectious diseases receive the most benefit from several university affiliations, with all researchers evaluated in the last two subjects having at least two affiliations on their profiles.

However, although the paper found a link between domestic mobility and research productivity and impact, mobility between countries did not have a significant effect, except in environmental geology, arts and humanities, and business.

Gali Halevi, chief director of the Levy Library at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, and co-author of the paper, suggested that these disciplines might benefit more from international mobility because they are more global in nature.

“Arts and humanities, for example, is related to culture and literature, so if you travel that usually enriches your experience. Some areas like engineering – not so much,” she told Times Higher Education.

In contrast, researchers in infectious diseases saw the most benefit when moving between two universities in one country. She suggested that this was because remaining within one country enables these academics to gain more in-depth knowledge in one area.

She added that international mobility might generally have less of a short-term effect on academic success than domestic mobility because of the “period of adjustment” required for researchers. Nevertheless, she said, moving country can provide other benefits such as enabling researchers to “expand your collaboration network” and “work with new people and new regions”.

ellie.bothwell@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns