Lecturers take ratings data complaints to Information Commissioner’s Office

Academics claim breach of data protection rules on Rate Your Lecturer website

August 22, 2013

The Information Commissioner’s Office is looking into the handling of personal data by Rate Your Lecturer, a website that encourages students to publicly comment on the performance of their university teachers.

The ICO, the UK’s independent authority for upholding information rights, has responded to at least two complaints about the site from lecturers. Rate Your Lecturer denies that it has broken any rules.

The site, launched by Sterling Ideas earlier this year, attempts to give a full list of academic staff at each UK higher education institution.

Bill Cooke, head of the department of organisation, work and technology at Lancaster University Management School, previously raised concerns that because the site was not registered as a data controller with the ICO – a requirement for firms that store personal data – it was in breach of data-protection rules.

Professor Cooke, along with at least one other lecturer, made a formal complaint to the ICO, alleging that the website refused to remove his personal details when requested to do so – something that he believes the site is obliged to do. The ICO has confirmed that it is investigating “several complaints” relating to Sterling Ideas under the Data Protection Act.

A second complainant, Bernardo Batiz-Lazo, professor of business history and bank management at Bangor Business School, Bangor University, said his concern was also around the use of his name without prior consent.

Michael Bulman, founder of the Rate Your Lecturer site, denied that his company had contravened any legislation or regulations, stating that all of the personal information about academics on Rate Your Lecturer was already “in the public domain”.

“We would also point out that we have a comprehensive reporting system on the website, for anyone objecting to specific ratings, although to date…the vast majority of ratings have been constructive and positive,” he said.

The ICO spokesman added: “We are currently making enquiries to see what action, if any, is required.”

If Sterling Ideas is found to be in breach of the Data Protection Act, it will be asked to change the way it operates in order to comply and to demonstrate that it takes its responsibilities under the act seriously.


Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Reader's comments (1)

It will be ridiculous if this changes anything. This RYL website has been a long time coming. It is about time lecturers were assessed as the current system does not work. Standards are not as good as they should be. If competition is ok and we must teach our children we have to try harder, then so do the 'adults' whining about being rated. If your teaching standards are fine then you shouldn't have a problem should you? As far as 'data protection' is concerned the name on screen is just a name and only relevant to those in the school so home addresses, mobile phone numbers and inside leg measurements are not provided. To the outside world the lecturer name could be Mickey Mouse, it makes no difference. This websites sole purpose is to give the lecturers that require it a kick up the bum to improve through competition with other lecturers. Peer viewpoint works, it's tough but so what, so is life! Stop whining, get on with teaching and improving!

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October