Keele explores ‘later specialisation’ after new courses pay off

Newly appointed vice-chancellor wants to embrace university’s interdisciplinary heritage while managing financial pressures

Published on
October 29, 2025
Last updated
November 3, 2025
Professor Kevin Shakesheff
Source: Keele University

A course portfolio review that has seen Britain’s first post-war university expand into new subject areas while closing low-enrolment programmes has helped exceed student recruitment targets, according to its new vice-chancellor.

Keele University has reduced its undergraduate course options from more than 200 five years ago to about 180 now but says it has still seen increased student demand.

Kevin Shakesheff, who took over at the university in September, said he is now keen to return the institution to its roots, by offering more interdisciplinary education and “late specialisation”.

Universities have come under pressure to rationalise course offerings and specialise in areas of strength as a way of overcoming financial challenges.

ADVERTISEMENT

Keele launched an array of new sports and exercise science courses in June 2024, followed by a suite of business management degrees later in the year. 

“There’s been some very good work done before I got here on improving and updating our portfolio,” said Shakesheff. “It feels to me that the strategy around new portfolios worked really well.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Next year, students will also be able to enrol in a range of new engineering degrees for the first time.

“Student choices are clearly changing. People are looking for different types of courses, so we’ve got to keep going on that.

“We will be exceeding recruitment targets this year, which is good, but I’m not complacent on that because the market for students is so volatile,” Shakesheff said.

Alongside the new launches, Keele has also shut courses that attracted few enrolments although it stressed no subject areas have been closed entirely.

Earlier this year, Shakesheff’s predecessor, longstanding vice-chancellor Trevor McMillan, planned cuts amounting to 150 jobs to help plug the university’s £5 million deficit. The university had already announced a previous savings target of £6 million. 

The move led staff to walk out for five days and the institution’s University and College Union called the plan an “ill-conceived solution” to the funding crisis.  

Six months on, Shakesheff said the university was about “two-thirds” of the way through its cost-saving and growth plans. 

“I think the most important thing is to be open and transparent and to talk early to staff about the situation that we’re in.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Longer term, Shakesheff said his priority will be consulting with students, staff and the local community on a new strategy for the university. 

“I’m deliberately giving ourselves quite a bit of time to do that,” he said. 

“I don’t want to be over-prescriptive, but my feeling is really making sure Keele plays a unique role in higher education. It was set up to be different to other universities, and I’d really like to build on that and my particular passions around late specialisation.”

Founded in 1949 by a former University of Oxford vice-chancellor, Keele was the first of the “new universities” formed after the Second World War, at a time when there were fewer than 20 universities in England.

Interdisciplinary education was key to the university’s offering from its inception, with all students originally required to complete a foundation year that spanned multiple disciplines, followed by degree programmes that involved two or more subjects. 

While undergraduates today can take more typical degree programmes, the university continues to offer a range of joint degrees including music production with business management, neuroscience with artificial intelligence, and philosophy and education. 

While he is reluctant to pre-empt the consultation, Shakesheff said that he wants to ensure the future strategy ensures students have “a really rounded experience” that enables them “to find their own way towards the career or whatever they want to do later on in life”. 

“That’s been really important in my career, working across disciplines,” said Shakesheff, a pharmacist who previously worked at the University of Nottingham and the Open University in pro vice-chancellor roles. 

Asked whether he would explore an American-style major and minor system, he said: “That might not quite be right for the future, but I think, even if you’re coming to do a specific specialism like chemistry, making sure that at Keele you get exposed to a whole range of different subject areas – that’s really important to me.

“The world’s obviously changing really fast. Careers are changing quickly, and I really feel that that’s important for the future. And given where Keele came from, it feels to me that we should be doing that in the future.”

ADVERTISEMENT

helen.packer@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Related universities

Reader's comments (9)

Kevin's salary has not been publicly disclosed yet. According to a survey by Times Higher Education back in 2018, Trevor McMillan, his predecessor at the time, earned a salary of £253,000 in 2016-17. Including pension contributions, his total remuneration package was £267,000 for that year.
Hardly relevant to the story. About time a VC actually started making hard strategic choices rather than aiming for short term feel good headlines that no one cares about.
They don't like being reminded of these things do they? It's only not relevant because the difficult questions are never put, so it's up to us to raise these inconvenient issues in whatever fora we can. Though I am amazed anyone ever reads these comments tbh! And senior management pay restraint and pay reform in the sector would be, in my view at least, a "hard strategic choice" that a courageous VC with integrity would be prepared to make or campaign for. You seem to be a bit of a toady to be honest.
That is how heckling works, my friend! You keep reminding them of the bad things they do all the time, especially when they prefer the focus to be on other matters in the find hope that they will take action. The technique was, however, used with great effect last week when HMK was heckled about what when he knew about the Epstein/Andrew affair (a very good question btw!). So it is not at all irrelevant just, if you like unwelcome. He can always come back with the claim that he serves his (undisclosed) pay award because he is the one, in your view, taking the "hard decisions".
what hard decisions? He is just carrying out the program of his predecessor and blathering on in the vaguest terms about degrees in terms of which no-one would really find much to disagree with.
I studied at Keele in the 1980s and it was unique at the time in having a Foundation Year (FY) that required exposure to a wide range of subjects: arts, social sciences and sciences. Even when we started our three year join honors subjects we had to do subsidiary subjects such as Maths or Politics that were different to our main interests to give us a more rounded education. I don't expect that students want 4 year degree courses anymore but the interdisciplinary approach seems to have become more mainstream now.
Interesting point, though interdisciplinary is often defined in more restricted ways. I have known several students who studied Joint English and Maths degrees for example and they were all excellent. However they were very few and far between and often that particular Joint subject is no longer available. I think the interdisciplinary we actually push is often pretty bogus concept as studying separate modules in History and one in Maths or Politics is not really interdisciplinary but studying just 2 disciplines. A module involving Maths and English studied together might be interdisciplinary if the methodologies of both disciplines are related to an object of study? The idea of interdisciplinary, as I understand it, is that metholodolgies from both disciplines are deployed in a field of enquiry. I also think that the agenda was used in a more instrumentalist way tbh and what one got was mediocrity in two disciplines rather than any enhancement. But I am a bit of a cynic when it comes to these things, sadly
Rather a modish sort of education from a bygone era.
This is fine as far as it goes but it does read like a brain dump stream of consciousness. Let's hope that any strategic work has input from business school scholars rather than left to the test tube botherers and snake oil consultants.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT