Ignorance of funders

January 3, 1997

WE NOTE and support the chorus of criticism over the classification of geography and psychology as "classroom-based" disciplines (THES, December 20). Like them, archaeology is believed to have been placed in the lowest funding price group in the HEFCE Funding Method for Teaching document. This displays a disquieting ignorance of archaeology.

For many years, archaeology has been a laboratory, computer and field-based discipline and one which makes extensive use of high-technology equipment of the sort commonly found in engineering and earth science departments. It was in recognition of this fact that archaeology had been placed previously in a part-laboratory funding band and, indeed, an additional special factor funding element was applied to a number of heavily science-based departments. The threatened loss of fee income would damage higher-cost teaching areas and could lead to staff losses and conceivably to departmental closures. Archaeology was placed fifth in the THES League of 69 subject areas on the basis of the weighted RAE average (5.492).

This truly world-class performance will be irreparably damaged if archaeology is forced to languish in the classroom-based funding group.

PROFESSOR K. J. EDWARDS Department of archaeology and prehistory, University of Sheffield; PROFESSOR A. M. POLLARD Department of archaeological sciences, University of Bradford; PROFESSOR E. A. SLATER, Department of archaeology, University of Liverpool; PROFESSOR M. S. TITE Research laboratory for archaeology, University of Oxford

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns