Horizon 2020 funding raid a ‘great concern’

Pan-Europe organisations attack Commission plans to move money for strategic investment fund

January 23, 2015

EU European Parliament

A group of European research and education organisations have expressed their “great concern” over plans to take funds from the Horizon 2020 budget to provide money for a strategic investment fund.

The European University Association, League of European Research Universities and Science Europe are among five organisations to issue a joint statement to oppose the move proposed by the European Commission that will see €2.7 billion (£2.02 billion) cut from its flagship research and innovation programme.

In a separate statement Leru says that cuts to the budget of the European Research Council and the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grants scheme – both parts of Horizon 2020 - are “unjustifiable”.

The new president of the EC, Jean-Claude Juncker has called for the creation of a €315 billion European Fund for Strategic Investment to boost public and private investment in the continent’s economy over the next three years.

Under current proposals being discussed in Brussels, some funding will come from the budget of Horizon 2020, the biggest European Union research and innovation programme worth €80 billion (£61.3 billion) in funding over the next six years.

The joint statement says “deviating funds from such a pan-EU research and innovation programme” to create funds for such a project “does not make sense”.

Any cuts to the budget will weaken Horizon 2020, it says. The regulations surrounding the strategic investment fund “offer little reassurance” that projects funded under it will support research and innovation activities, it adds.

In a separate statement Leru describes the decision as “short sighted”. “Investments in ERC-type…research are proven to lead to longer-term and larger positive spill-overs to the economy than government investments in innovation,” it says.

The EC has said that the strategic investment fund will direct investments to research, but Leru argues that this will not be the case in the short term.

“It’s highly likely that these investments will be in applied and close-to-market research and development, not in ERC-type…research,” it says. The ERC typically funds blue skies research.

Signatories of the joint statement also include the Conference of European Schools for Advanced Engineering Education and Research and EARTO, an association of European research and technology organisations.

holly.else@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

When consultation is undertaken to put in place strategy of the nature EU2020 one can be forgiven for thinking that material changes should attract similar path of consultation. Considering that ECB is set on Quantitative Easing (QE) with cash to flash, it is still possible to accommodate all initiatives without having to tamper the agreed EU2020. Hopefully Mr Jean Claude Juncker is now considering this option.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham