Warnings issued over EU research budget changes

The performance of the whole European research system could be harmed if changes to EU budgets go ahead, it has been warned.

January 19, 2015

European Union

The European University Association has meanwhile called on countries to oppose some of the proposals by the European Commission to divert money from the Horizon 2020 budget – a major source of funding to UK universities and research centres.

The EUA expressed its “strong disappointment” that two components of the EU’s research policy – the European Research Council and the European Institute of Innovation and Technology – would be heavily hit by the move. It stressed that the budget for the EIT would already be reduced this year.

Horizon 2020 is the biggest EU research and innovation programme, worth €80 billion (£61.3 billion) in funding over the next six years.

It aims to drive economic growth by investing in research, but funds from Horizon 2020 will now account for a third of €8 billion to be mobilised for the newly created European Fund for Strategic Investments.

Jean-Claude Juncker, the European Commission president, hoped the EFSI’s €315 billion investment plan would ignite the EU economy. He said: “We are taking an important step towards putting Europeans back into jobs and kick-starting the Union’s economy.”

Academics in the UK were projected to receive £2 billion in the first two years of the Horizon 2020 programme, according to Universities UK, but the plans to divert money away from it have worried research organisations.

Sir Christopher Snowden, president of Universities UK, said: “Cutting the Horizon 2020 budget at this stage would risk harming the performance of the whole European research system.

“Public investment in research and innovation boosts the prosperity and growth potential of the economy.”

He added: “Our competitors outside the EU are investing in, not cutting, research. China’s investment in research, for example, has increased dramatically in recent years, and it now spends a greater proportion of its GDP on research and development than the UK.

“It is by investing in world-leading research and innovation that the EU will help secure growth and respond to changing needs.”

If the proposals are approved, Horizon 2020 will lose €860 million of its planned budget in 2016, €871 million in 2017 and €479 million in 2018.

UK universities currently receive up to 20 per cent of their external research income from the EU.

In the proposal, the European Commission defended the decision, stating: “The reduction of both programmes to finance the guarantee fund is expected to ensure a greater investment in certain areas of their respective mandates than is possible through the existing programmes.”

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham