Grant winners

October 27, 2011


Investigator Awards

Investigators will receive sums ranging from £500,000 over three years to more than £3 million over seven years.

• Award winner: Finn Werner

• Institution: University College London

An integrated study of RNAP transcription

• Award winner: Steven W. Kennerley

• Institution: University College London

Neuronal mechanisms underlying value-based decision-making and action selection


• Award winner: Jane Seymour

• Institution: University of Nottingham

• Value: £163,760

Understanding the role of nurses in decisions to use anticipatory prescriptions to manage symptoms and distress in the last days of life: a prospective community-based study using mixed methods

• Award winner: Debra Howell

• Institution: University of York

• Value: £269,728

Exploration of factors associated with place of care and death in patients with haematological malignancies

• Award winners: Maureen Coombs and Alison Richardson

• Institution: University of Southampton

• Value: £166,825

An investigation about transferring patients in critical care home to die: experiences, attitudes, population characteristics and practice


• Award winner: John Marshall

• Institution: University College London

• Value: £124,840

Blindness: treating childhood cataracts

• Award winner: Richard Apps

• Institution: University of Bristol

• Value: £98,120

Brain tumour removal: minimising brain damage

• Award winner: Marianne Thoresen

• Institution: University of Bristol

• Value: £125,341

Birth asphyxia: preventing brain damage

• Award winner: Fiona Denison

• Institution: University of Edinburgh

• Value: £96,450

Pregnancy complications: using new imaging techniques to predict problems

• Award winner: Andres Lopez Bernal

• Institution: University of Bristol

• Value: £195,773

Preterm labour: studying the actions of oxytocin

• Award winner: Lucy Raymond

• Institution: University of Cambridge

• Value: £165,529

Stillbirth: investigating the causes


• Award winner: Rose Zamoyska

• Institution: University of Edinburgh

Mechanisms that regulate T-cell responses and their failure in autoimmunity

Immune responses are balanced through cross-talk between tyrosine kinases and phosphatases immediately downstream of T-cell receptors. Changes in expression and point mutations in these enzymes have been linked to autoimmunity. This project will explore how these mutations perturb homeostasis and lead to a failure of regulation, and at what point such perturbations tip into immunopathology and autoimmunity. A combined approach will be used, involving: modelling T-cell function and regulation in vitro and in vivo; mass spectrometry to identify global changes in the cell associated with disregulated T-cell activity; and analysis of the role of mRNA translational regulation as a control point in lymphocyte homeostasis.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry