Gender-divided events divide students

No consensus among student representatives on segregated audiences for campus events, THE poll suggests

February 6, 2014

Source: PA Photos

Equal treatment: segregation is still the subject of heated debate on campus

Students elected to represent women and diversity issues are divided about whether gender-segregated events should be allowed on campus, a Times Higher Education survey suggests.

Asked if they would support student societies asking for segregation based on a variety of factors, including gender, less than half of the 17 respondents said that such requests should always be refused.

The issue came to the fore recently when Universities UK published advice suggesting that a religious speaker’s freedom of expression might be infringed if a request for gender segregation were not accommodated.

Some respondents to the THE survey expressed concern that criticism of gender segregation could be oppressive to minority groups.

Joe Killen, welfare and diversity officer at the students’ union for Goldsmiths, University of London, cited segregation’s importance in political movements. “It would be inappropriate of us to say that our students do not have the right to draw the parameters of the spaces they need,” he said. “Further, it is dangerous to civil liberties in the UK to deny right to assembly for certain campus groups based on their members’ shared minority status.”

Replying to the survey on behalf of the women’s officer at King’s College London Students’ Union, Shaheen Sattar, a National Union of Students delegate, said the “stench of Islamophobia” had been “masked with feminism” in politicians’ criticisms of gender segregation.

“The fact is, gender segregation is firm to the principles of Islam, and should be respected, if not tolerated, in institutes of higher education,” she said.

However, Danielle Garrett, women’s officer at Glasgow Caledonian University Students’ Association, was among those who felt that any request for segregation would be hard to justify: “A society represents a university, and as a public institution it should treat everyone equally and give everyone the same opportunities.”

Alice Phillips, women’s officer for the University of Bristol Students’ Union, agreed. “If men or women voluntarily choose to segregate themselves, that is different…but societies should not have a formalised policy of segregation,” she said.

Many respondents were also keen to point out non-religious scenarios in which they felt segregation was necessary.

“Our feminist society, whose committee I sat on last year, sometimes holds women-only events, and I feel this is a really important right…as there are issues women may only feel comfortable raising in the presence of other women,” said Clopin Meehan, gender equality officer at the University of Glasgow Students’ Representative Council.

An NUS spokesman said it “supports the rights of groups to self-organise” but “certainly” did not endorse enforced segregation.

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham