No excuses on teaching quality with £9K fees, says Willetts

Former universities minister argues government is right to demand improvements in light of increased tuition income

January 27, 2016
David Willetts
Source: Julian Anderson

The introduction of £9,000 tuition fees means that universities no longer have a “reasonable alibi” for complaints about teaching quality, Lord Willetts has said.

Speaking at a debate organised by the Higher Education Policy Institute and the Higher Education Academy as the government considers plans to introduce a teaching excellence framework, the former universities minister highlighted that funding per student in England had been falling for several decades up to the mid-2000s.

This decline in public and private funding had given institutions a “very reasonable alibi for anxieties about teaching quality”, he said, particularly when funding for schools had been better protected.

However, Lord Willetts said that the introduction of £3,000 tuition fees in 2006 had stabilised the unit of resource; and that, since the cap was lifted to £9,000 in 2012, it had gone up.

“That gives…the government the right to say ‘we have done our bit, we took a large amount of political flak and have done something which has successfully increased the cash behind each student to pay for their teaching’,” the peer said. “Now that we’ve done that, what are universities going to do to show…that there is really a concentration on improving the quality of teaching?”

“That is clearly at the top of the new government’s agenda, and quite rightly so.”

Lord Willetts said that the initial metrics proposed for the TEF – data on retention and graduate employment, plus National Student Survey results – got “to the heart of the kind of issues that students care about”, but he said it was important that the metrics were considered in their proper context.

Speaking at the same event, Gwen van der Velden, director of learning and teaching enhancement at the University of Bath, argued that the “major gap” in the TEF was that it did not make any attempt to deliver a more internationalised higher education experience for students.

As society grappled with global challenges such as terrorism, climate change and health, there was a “need for more informed discussion and the presence of a wider mindset” that universities could help to foster, she said.

chris.havergal@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Related universities

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: ‘No excuses for poor teaching in £9K fees era’

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

question marks PhD study

Selecting the right doctorate is crucial for success. Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman share top 10 tips on how to pick a PhD

Pencil lying on open diary

Requesting a log of daily activity means that trust between the institution and the scholar has broken down, says Toby Miller

India, UK, flag

Sir Keith Burnett reflects on what he learned about international students while in India with the UK prime minister

Application for graduate job
Universities producing the most employable graduates have been ranked by companies around the world in the Global University Employability Ranking 2016
Construction workers erecting barriers

Directly linking non-EU recruitment to award levels in teaching assessment has also been under consideration, sources suggest