Cambridge v-c warns Brexit would isolate UK researchers

Sir Leszek Borysiewicz says that universities would lose hundreds of millions of pounds a year in EU funding

April 23, 2015
Sir Leszek Borysiewicz, vice-chancellor University of Cambridge
Sir Leszek Borysiewicz, who will come to the end of his term in 2017

Academics could be cut off from international partnerships that generate world-leading research if the UK were to leave the European Union, the University of Cambridge vice-chancellor has warned.

Arguing for a “sensible debate about the UK’s membership of the EU”, Sir Leszek Borysiewicz said research at universities across Europe would be severely damaged if the UK voted to leave the union.

UK universities would lose hundreds of millions of pounds a year in EU research funding, and a UK exit would also destroy links with world-class institutions made possible by pan-European funding.

“The real loss is that we would not be able to collaborate in the way we do today,” said Sir Leszek in a speech at a reception for UK vice-chancellors in Brussels on 13 April.

“The UK needs Europe and Europe needs the UK,” he added, saying that the EU managed to “bring together academics to work on today’s big global challenges” and that “together we are much stronger than we are separately”.

The exclusion of Switzerland’s universities from EU research projects – after it breached freedom of labour rules by voting to impose immigration quotas on Croatian workers – showed the potential dangers to science, Sir Leszek warned. “Do we want to be outside the EU, where the Swiss [found] themselves after a referendum they held?” he said.

Universities are also often at the heart of high-tech centres that generate thousands of good jobs, he argued, which could be at risk if the UK was sidelined.

In a Universities UK blog published on 13 April, Sir Leszek also said he was disappointed to see how parties “across the political spectrum” were discussing immigration. As the son of Polish émigrés incarcerated in Siberia during the Second World War who later came to the UK, Sir Leszek said he owed much to “the UK’s historically open and positive attitude to immigrants”.

“The UK’s future, as a member of the EU, cannot be decided by an intemperate, ill-defined and ill-informed debate on immigration. For universities, EU funding alone is too important to be sacrificed for short-term electoral success,” he said.

jack.grove@tesglobal.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

well said Borys!

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham