BPP University College criticised in QAA report

Institutional review approves academic standards but says ‘lack of clarity’ in marketing claims could be ‘misleading’

February 28, 2013

Source: Getty

Don’t overstep: BPP has been warned about its marketing material

For-profit-owned BPP University College has been told to make improvements to marketing materials after potentially “misleading” claims over courses were identified by the sector’s quality watchdog.

The verdict was delivered in BPP’s first institutional review by the Quality Assurance Agency, published on 11 February, and comes as it awaits the outcome of its application for full university status.

BPP, whose parent company is US for-profit firm Apollo Group, was found to meet three of the review’s four criteria: academic standards, quality of student learning and enhancement of student learning.

But the university college, which specialises in professional and business courses such as law and accountancy, was told by the QAA that “information about learning opportunities…requires improvement to meet UK expectations”.

Information in advertising literature was described as a source of “potential confusion” because of its “lack of clarity”, the report says.

Peer reviewers visiting BPP, which had 6,780 students in 2011-12, said that applicants “may not find the information about the learning opportunities offered is fit for purpose, accessible and sufficiently clear or complete”.

One area of concern was the lack of clarity over courses at BPP’s regional branches. The review team, which visited the college in November, said it had found evidence that students admitted to branches outside London were not aware that lectures would be delivered “remotely” rather than face to face.

Information on some courses that were advertised as available at regional branches but had not yet received approval carried no cautionary notice such as “subject to validation”. There was also a “lack of clarity” both in printed publications and on BPP’s website over whether courses would be delivered by the college or other parties.

Reviewers also took issue with claims of “consistently outstanding student satisfaction” scores, saying it was difficult to compare the scores of an internal survey to those found in the National Student Survey. Using the word “outstanding” implied that BPP was “consistently performing above other institutions and…this could be taken as misleading”, the report says.

Carl Lygo, BPP’s principal and group chief executive, said he was “delighted” by the overall report.

BPP is only the second for-profit-owned institution to undergo a full institutional review. In September, GSM London (formerly Greenwich School of Management) was told to improve student learning opportunities, although the QAA approved its academic standards processes.


You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

men in office with feet on desk. Vintage

Three-quarters of respondents are dissatisfied with the people running their institutions

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate