Access research ‘defending spending, not improving outreach’

Call for access agreements to draw on more sophisticated evaluation and analysis

August 11, 2016
Busker watching a graduating student and his family
Source: Alamy
Mind the gap: only 11 institutions referred to research resulting in improvements to outreach activities or courses to improve student experience or participation

Most English universities are using widening participation research to defend their spending, not to improve their outreach activities, according to a study.

Academics at Bournemouth University and the University of Liverpool analysed all 517 access agreements approved by the Office for Fair Access over the past three years and found that 83 per cent of institutions referenced research, evaluation or analysis in their plans for 2016-17, up from 67 per cent in 2014-15.

However, in their 2015-16 agreements, more than half of institutions referred to research in an attempt to justify spending on financial support for students – research that is often “not as robust as it could be”, the authors say.

In contrast, only 11 institutions referred to research resulting in improvements to outreach activities or courses in order to improve student participation or experience, according to a paper published in Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning.

Lead author Alex Wardrop, Bournemouth’s postdoctoral research fellow in fair access to higher education, said that the defensive deployment of research could reflect the importance of the agreements to universities’ ability to charge higher-level fees.

But she argued that widening participation could be made much more effective if research were used to challenge the status quo, not to shore it up.

“Research is about learning, reflecting and changing how things are done; and for widening participation, it is about transforming what higher education looks like and asking why we have persistent inequalities in educational outcomes,” Dr Wardrop said. “Research activity can be a really good way of reflecting on inequality, learning what doesn’t work so well.”

While the study found significant growth in the use of research in access agreements, it also suggests that the sophistication of analysis and evaluation in widening participation could still improve.

Only 52 per cent of 2016-17 access agreements referred to what the authors described as robust and established research approaches, including mixed method or longitudinal studies, although this was up from 35 per cent in 2014-15.

Just 24 per cent of institutions stated in their 2016-17 agreements that they involved academics in their widening participation research, up from 14 per cent two years previously.

Dr Wardrop said that this could reflect the relative isolation of widening participation teams in some universities.

“The way widening participation sits in universities is often quite marginalised or ad hoc, particularly around evaluation,” Dr Wardrop said.

chris.havergal@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Worried man wiping forehead
Two academics explain how to beat some of the typical anxieties associated with a doctoral degree
A group of flamingos and a Marabou stork

A right-wing philosopher in Texas tells John Gill how a minority of students can shut down debates and intimidate lecturers – and why he backs Trump

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

As the country succeeds in attracting even more students from overseas, a mixture of demographics, ‘soft power’ concerns and local politics help explain its policy