Outreach: prove you are not wasting money, universities told

Sutton Trust urges higher education institutions to devote 10 per cent of outreach budgets to evaluating effectiveness

December 17, 2015
Blindfolded business people holding arms out

Universities have been urged to allocate 10 per cent of their outreach budgets to evaluative studies as an analysis triggers warnings that some of the £125 million spent annually on the activity could be going to waste.

A paper published by the Sutton Trust on 17 December highlights the lack of robust evidence about the efficacy of initiatives designed to widen access to higher education – in particular, it notes the paucity of randomised trials with a control group.

The charity will next year launch a research programme to measure the effectiveness of outreach activities, in partnership with the Office for Fair Access. But it argues that institutions need to increase their spending on evaluation, too, even if this means reducing the funds available for tackling disadvantage in the short term.

Lee Elliot Major, chief executive of the Sutton Trust, said that universities had to spend more on evaluation to eradicate the possibility that some outreach activities were a “waste of money”.

“Everyone wants to help the children from disadvantaged and non-privileged backgrounds that we are trying to help, but we don’t know whether all this hard work that is being done is actually having an impact or not, so I think this has to be money well spent,” Dr Elliot Major said.

“It is immoral in many ways not to have some evidence of the impact of what we are trying to do.”

The Sutton Trust paper, based on research by Carole Torgerson, professor of education at Durham University, surveys what evidence there is. On this basis, it suggests that the most effective outreach strategies appear to be personalised application information and assistance for applicants, residential programmes and mentoring, or a mix of interventions.

On the question of whether bursaries help to widen access – let alone whether they improve retention – Professor Torgerson finds that the evidence is more mixed. English institutions are set to spend £440.9 million on financial support for students this year, on top of the £124.5 million outreach budget.

“I do worry that these budgets will come under attack within universities and in the public arena more generally if we don’t show they are working properly,” Dr Elliot Major added.


You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Related universities


Print headline: Prove outreach isn’t a waste, universities told

Reader's comments (1)

Lee Elliot Major, chief executive of the Sutton Trust, said that universities had to spend more on evaluation to eradicate the possibility that some outreach activities were a “waste of money”. The Trust takes it as read - as an article of faith even - that admitting large numbers of 'widening access' students into higher education is not itself 'a waste of money'.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Home secretary says government will support 'best' universities

Man handing microphone to audience member

Academic attainment of disadvantaged students can be improved if they can decide how they are assessed, study claims

Woman drinking tea from saucer

Plugging a multibillion-pound deficit exacerbated by June’s poll result may require ‘drastic measures’, analysts have warned

Italy's gold medallist

New measures to ensure universities are ‘not penalised’ for taking poorer students also outlined for next stage of TEF

Classroom, school

Higher education institutions can and should do more to influence education at a secondary school level, says Edward Peck