Gloucestershire partnership a failure, says QAA

January 10, 2013

The “systemic failure” of a university’s partnership with a private college meant that 40 master’s students did not take their course, the sector’s quality watchdog has found.

The Quality Assurance Agency has published a “concerns” report into the partnership between the University of Gloucestershire and London-based Williams College. The investigation focused mainly on a university-franchised MBA, one of 13 franchise programmes included in the partnership.

Gloucestershire’s franchise model meant the partner was responsible for “teaching, setting and marking assessed work, subject only to university approval and moderation - normally by sample - undertaken by the university and its external examiners”, the QAA says.

But the college “frequently ignored university protocols and procedures”, while Gloucestershire “failed to undertake formal monitoring on a consistent basis”.

The QAA report says: “Together, this constitutes a systemic failure of the Williams College partnership.”

The report refers to a cohort of MBA students due to start in June 2011 who became “the unwitting victims of a prolonged inter-institutional dispute” between Gloucestershire and Williams College.

In August 2011 the university refused admission to the cohort even though they had already begun studying. It then took eight months of “intermittent discussion” before an agreement permitted them to formally begin the course “provided that they fulfilled entry requirements and retook all their MBA work”.

Only two students of the original cohort of 42 accepted the offer, the report says.

Gloucestershire said it has “implemented a new team structure and leadership to ensure that the expected standards are consistently achieved in all our collaborative partnerships”.

The university has also given Williams College notice of its intention to terminate its contract with the for-profit institution.

It is not the first of Gloucestershire’s private validation partnerships to have presented problems. The university agreed an out-of-court settlement with Guildhall College in December after legal action followed the termination of its contract with the institution in March 2012.

john.morgan@tsleducation.com.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Capsized woman and boat

Early career academics can be left to sink or swim when navigating the choppy waters of learning scholarly writing. Helen Sword says a more formal, communal approach can help everyone, especially women

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan