Chávez's socialism at the heart of the system

Venezuela’s revolution will not die with its leader, but will live on in its academy, says Mike Cole

March 14, 2013

Source: Rafal Cichawa /

As socialists mourn the death last week of President Hugo Chávez, now seems a good time to take stock of what has been achieved in Venezuelan higher education since his election in 1999.

The higher education systems of the UK and Venezuela are microcosms of fundamentally differing economic and political conceptions of what is fit for purpose. The massive increase in managerialism and top-down control in UK universities is well documented. In Venezuela, while the exclusionary and elitist vestiges that dominated higher education pre-Chávez continue to exist, stringent efforts are being made to tackle them.

One example is the University Education Act. Currently the subject of national debate, this legislation would require university councils to be elected on each campus through a one-person, one-vote democratic system. Those entitled to vote would include students, academics, administrators and workers. The current system gives virtually no power to students or workers.

Tuition fees in England, now up to £9,000, are among the highest in the world. Mission Sucre, by contrast, is a good example of 21st-century socialism’s democratisation of higher education: it provides free, continuing tutelage to the 2 million adult Venezuelans who did not complete their elementary schooling under the old regime.

In the UK, there are just under 2.5 million students in higher education. In Venezuela, which has less than half the population of the UK, the number is 3 million, with enrolment up 170 per cent since 1999.

A fair retort might be: “But what about quality?” Well, Venezuelan universities compare well with other Latin American institutions in the international rankings. Furthermore, UK notions of “quality” miss the point and raise the question, “quality for whom?” What is the class background of those studying at the UK’s league-table leaders? What about those poor working-class students now effectively excluded from higher education by the unpalatable prospect of incurring tens of thousands of pounds in debt? What about quality of life?

In the UK, the university’s role as a functionary for capitalism is firmly entrenched. In Venezuela, the goal of education is to produce not human capital but a critical citizenry and social justice on a mass scale. When education is designed to serve society, it cannot be articulated only or mainly in positivistic, quantifiable standards. For example, the Bolivarian University of Venezuela (UBV), founded in 2003 by presidential decree, is part of a major attempt to extend access. Free to all students, social justice and equality are at the core of its educational content, and all courses taken there use “participatory action research” methodology: a multidisciplinary approach that links theory and practice, and bases students in their local communities, working on community projects that form a central part of formal study.

The spirit of the proposed University Education Act is already well established in Venezuela. At the start of one of several seminars I have given at UBV, for instance, a caretaker arrived to unlock the room. Instead of going on to other chores, he sat down, listened and actively contributed to the discussion. A lively interchange of views ensued about the meaning of socialism.

Another abiding memory I have of Caracas is my first visit to a local bar. From the bustle and vibe emanating from inside, I expected to find a lot of noisy male football supporters shouting at a TV screen. Instead, I encountered men and women from the local barrio engaged in serious and passionate discussions about the president and the direction of the revolution.

Chávez’s death is a tragedy of immense proportions for the Bolivarian Revolution. However, 21st-century socialism is and must be first and foremost a revolution of the people, as Chávez was well aware. The fact that the people have taken socialism to heart, in higher education as in other areas of life, ensures that the revolution he started will not die with him.

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Reader's comments (2)

Mr. Mike Cole Please yoy are describing a complete fiction. Students from public universities lack the basisc Mathematics and Reading skills. What's the name of the bar you saw people talking about socialism? thwy woul be rather talking about a friend or a family member killed by rampamt criminality, change information about where to find rice or milk, about inflation, Jobs a other very mundane needs. Please Mr. Mike be real. All the "good"things made by Chavez socialism is only to impress naive foreigners. Besides socialists farms that don't produce a dam thing, a parrallel health system that doesn"t work, a food distribution system in implosión you are left with very Little done. It's a show room. I'm willing to help you to do a true research. please be honest. Regards Juan Gonçalves
From the TV coverage of the numbers of Venezuelan people expressing their grief so graphically it is clear to most outside the country that the death of Chavez was significant and heart-felt for vast numbers of Venezuelans - a pictorial representation of an outpouring of national grief. Juan Goncalves’ personal-view re. "All the ‘good’ things made by Chavez socialism is only to impress naive foreigners" ; is a view that lacks the quantitative and qualitative evidence that others can bring-to-bear to challenge it: clearly, despite the poverty and associated hardships experienced in Venezuela, Juan Concalves’ view flies-in-the-face of popular opinion expressed - as in the recent TV coverage seen worldwide. Keith Mercer, Brighton & Hove, UK.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments