Intellectual fruit of neoliberal seedbed

October 24, 2013

In bemoaning the decline in higher education research since the publication of the Robbins report, Gareth Williams diplomatically sidesteps an assumption that Lord Robbins made that neither he nor other celebrants of the report’s golden anniversary might accept today (“Will Robbins ride again?”, Opinion, 17 October). Of course, Robbins urged the expansion of universities as an opportunity to attract talented people from all classes who might not otherwise have gone to Oxbridge. However, he did this in the spirit of what we would now call “human capital development”. In effect, Robbins regarded the universities of Oxford and Cambridge as intellectual protectionists that imposed artificially high barriers to student entry. His solution was to license the creation of rival high-quality institutions (such as my own) that were explicitly focused on contemporary subjects.

However, Robbins was not committed to an egalitarian welfare state in which everyone would have the right to go to university. Indeed, in the history of economics he is known as one of the staunchest opponents of the idea that “welfare” should be seen as a regulative principle of economic life, as that would sacrifice productivity on the altar of security. As economics chair at the London School of Economics, Robbins was responsible for hiring Friedrich Hayek, and in the post-war period he joined Hayek as a member of the Mont Pelerin Society, the club that is nowadays seen as the intellectual seedbed for neoliberalism.

In short, the Robbins report should be read as an early neoliberal document about opening up a previously closed market. The continued viability of its proposals should be judged in terms of whether human capital - or “talent” - is likely to be best exploited simply by making it easier for young people to enter university. A latter-day Robbins may well adopt a line much closer to King’s College London economist Alison Wolf’s - namely, that the real focus should be on supporting non-university education that is sensitive to other forms of talent.

Steve Fuller
Auguste Comte chair in social epistemology
University of Warwick

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham