I presume Gerard Kelly is seriously challenged by theology given the vehemence of his claims: "devoted to the study of a fraudulent notion", "such obtuseness" and "theology ... has two strands ... exegesis ... and ... religious studies"; and his choice of examples to study ("Let us not prey on theology", 24 January). Why not study why church schools are successful, and popular not only with Christians, but also Hindus, Muslims and secularists?
The severity of the challenge has apparently rendered Kelly unable to find out that theology is not identical to exegesis. His ignorance of theology and philosophy suggest that he is not immune to obtuseness.
Jane Hutton, Chairman, Department of Statistics, University of Warwick.
Please
or to read this article.Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Subscribe
Already registered or a current subscriber?
