Academic reputations: will the TEF be a game changer?

The exercise has the potential to shake up the current hierarchy and will be judged on whether it revises how firms and students view universities

June 23, 2016
Man in suit pressing 'Like' button on touchscreen
Source: iStock

Reputation matters a great deal in higher education and both individuals and universities trade on it far more than they may care to admit.

But in academia, reputation has long been based on research performance: the prestige of a paper in a high-ranking journal, or position in a league table focused on research outcomes.

The teaching excellence framework (TEF) is looking to break this monopoly. And the world will be watching: governments to see whether the TEF is a successful system that can be replicated; potential students to assess the best places to invest their time and tuition fees.

There are lots of concerns about the TEF. Some were acted on in the recent White Paper, others remain. Many rightly fear the consequences of higher education being metricised to within an inch of its life, and it’s undeniable that the measures themselves have individual and collective problems.

But there is also a widespread acceptance that the goal of the TEF – to recognise and reward institutions that really deliver for students – is the right one.

And as a means to tease out valuable points of difference and challenge the status quo, it has the potential to be a game changer if – and this is a crucial if – students and employers buy into it.

This week, we publish an exclusive analysis by the Times Higher Education data team who compile our World University Rankings, considering how the existing hierarchy may be challenged by the TEF. This is not an exact replica of the forthcoming exercise – we have used just one year of data, for example, and we do not have the element of peer review that will be included in the TEF proper.

But our analysis is based on the same three data sources that TEF will draw on in its opening stages. And we have produced both an absolute score (which is largely a reflection of the preconceived order) and a picture of performance against benchmarks.

It is this second analysis that reflects the differing reality of student intake and output, institution by institution.

This is where the government hopes that the TEF will bring real pressure to bear; for the first time, prospective students will see how institutions are performing on the measures that are assumed to matter to them the most.

Doubts will remain about whether such metrics can ever be proxies for teaching quality, but this may be beside the point, since satisfaction, retention and graduate outcomes are likely – all things being equal – to matter more to most students than research citation scores.

The TEF’s impact, however, depends on whether this new perspective of university performance translates into revised reputations in the minds of students and employers.

Will the latter, for example, view relative performance against benchmark as a valuable indicator of graduates with upward momentum? Or will they care only about absolute scores when they make decisions about who to recruit?

In his great interrogation of reputation in Othello, Shakespeare gave two interpretations: for Cassio it was the “immortal part of myself”, while Iago saw it as “an idle and most false imposition, oft got without merit and lost without deserving”.

The TEF will offer a new perspective on prestige, but in the end it will succeed in its stated goal only if it redefines academic reputation – the immortal currency of higher education.

john.gill@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Will the TEF shuffle the pack?

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan