UK universities fear collision of REF and subject TEF

Institutions face ‘never-ending rollercoaster’ of assessment, conference hears

November 2, 2018
Mechanic making a dummy
Source: Getty
Crash test critics describe the UK government’s plans as leading to a ‘never-ending roller coaster’ of assessment

The concurrence of a beefed-up subject-level teaching excellence framework and the UK’s next research excellence framework leaves universities facing a “never-ending roller coaster” of assessment, a conference has heard.

The Westminster government last month announced plans to transform the TEF – which currently operates at provider level only – with detailed evaluations of higher education providers’ performance in 34 specific subject areas.

Disciplinary-level judgements will be made by expert panels considering student outcome metrics and written submissions from departments, alongside the existing institutional-level assessments.

The new model will be piloted this year, ahead of its full implementation in 2019-20.

But Alan Palmer, head of policy at the MillionPlus group of universities, highlighted that this would coincide with the next REF – a huge undertaking that again involves panels assessing disciplinary-level performance – which will run through 2020.

Speaking at a Westminster Higher Education Forum conference, Mr Palmer said that he found it “surprising and staggering” that the government had acknowledged that the revised TEF would increase the burden on universities but “does not seem to care”.

The same staff members at institutions would likely be compiling and reviewing submissions for both the REF and the TEF, he said.

“I see a never-ending roller coaster of guidance, consultations, preparations, submissions, results, then strategy revision, with institutions doing nothing more than ‘being accountable’,” Mr Palmer warned.

Nick Petford, vice-chancellor of the University of Northampton, told the event that the subject-level TEF risked undermining the positive impact that he perceived from previous iterations of the framework.

“There’s more metrics, there’s more complexity, there’s more burden on staff and it’s more expensive,” he said.

Graeme Rosenberg, TEF manager at the English higher education regulator, the Office for Students, admitted that there would be some overlap in framework submissions for the two exercises but said that the intention was for the final deadlines to be six months apart, with the TEF scheduled for spring 2020 and the REF wrapping up in November.

Panellists also questioned how the OfS would manage the volume of panellists needed for subject-level and provider-level TEF assessments.

Mr Rosenberg said the regulator had estimated that it would need 300 to 400 panel members to look at 3,000 to 4,000 subject submissions and that it had “reconfigured the panels to scale it up”.

He added that the Department for Education had calculated that the subject-level TEF would cost between £16 million and £24 million per exercise, divided between four to six years, with the panels costing costing roughly 25 per cent more. This was one-tenth of the cost of the REF, he said.

anna.mckie@timeshighereducation.com

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

相关文章

Reader's comments (1)

Yes more wasted money, time and extra bureaucracy leading to meaningless bronze, silver and gold TEF subject awards !! No one cares about these silly awards apart from the boring bureacrats whose useless jobs depend on them.

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

赞助