OfS criticised for lack of diversity on student hate crime panel

English regulator promises to make Student Welfare and Safeguarding Expert Advisory panel more representative

十一月 1, 2019
White paint
Source: iStock

England’s higher education regulator has pledged to take action after it was criticised for a lack of diversity on a panel tasked with advising its work on harassment and hate crime.

The issue arose when the Office for Students tweeted a picture of members of its Student Welfare and Safeguarding Expert Advisory Panel. Times Higher Education understands that the picture may have not included all panel members.

“Our new Student Welfare and Safeguarding Expert Advisory Panel met for the first time today in London. The panel has been formed to advise and contribute to our work in areas such as mental health, harassment, hate crime, and sexual misconduct,” the tweet said.

However, Twitter users were quick to point out that there were no black students in the picture.

Olumide Adisa, research fellow and interim head of the Centre of Abuse Research at the University of Suffolk, tweeted that it was a “Fab development! But v. concerning that there’s no black representation on your panel (from the pic). Black & minority ethnic groups living in the UK more likely to be diagnosed with mental health problems & more likely to disengage from MH services.”

Melanie Crofts, a senior lecturer at De Montfort Law School, agreed. “No excuse for not having PoC represented,” she tweeted.

The row comes weeks after an Equality and Human Rights Commission report revealed that a quarter of ethnic minority students in the UK have experienced racial harassment at university. It found that 56 per cent of respondents to its survey who had been racially harassed had experienced racist name-calling, insults and jokes and 20 per cent had been physically attacked.

The report also said universities were “oblivious” to the scale of the problem.

A spokesman for the Office for Students said: “We discussed the membership of the group at its first meeting with the aim of achieving diversity on the panel. We agreed further action was needed and are actively seeking to address this issue. Diverse voices and underrepresented groups must be heard across all of the OfS’ work and advisory panels.”

anna.mckie@timeshighereducation.com

登录 或者 注册 以便阅读全文。

请先注册再进行下一步

获得一个月的无限制地在线阅读网站内容。只需注册并完成您的职业简介.

注册是免费的,而且非常简单。一旦成功注册,您可以每个月免费阅读3篇文章。:

  • 获得编辑推荐文章
  • 率先获得泰晤士高等教育世界大学排名相关的新闻
  • 获得职位推荐、筛选工作和保存工作搜索结果
  • 参与读者讨论和公布评论
注册

相关文章

欢迎反馈

Log in or register to post comments

评论最多

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 十月