How to get your research found on Google Scholar

If you want to be a famous scientist, quit with the cute titles. Many budding academics crave recognition and influence with their peers and impact on knowledge production, but then they go and kneecap themselves with the title of their article or paper.

We like to think our work rises (or falls) on its quality. That’s comforting, but it’s not how Google Scholar works. It’s an attention market, not a library. And most academics don’t know how to sell their wares. I’ve curated academic work across three different journals and supervised many PhDs. I’ve trialled, failed and succeeded many times at the academic publishing game, and discovered what works. 

The first thing you need to accept is that your work is not going to be found in the pages of a specific journal. The journal is a credibility mechanism, designed to feed work into online discovery machines. No one has picked up and read a journal in decades. Discovery on Google Scholar is the name of the game.

• What is developmental editing, and why does your scholarly manuscript need it?
• Spotlight guide: What you need to know about academic publishing today
• Writing your first journal article? Here’s how to get the structure right

Scholar is a ranking system. It rewards scholars who can clearly and transparently identify the core concepts in their work, as well as readily accessible online versions of that work and evidence of early traction. If you understand that, you can shape whether your work is seen – or quietly buried.

Here are four things that most people miss when they are preparing their work for online publication.

1. Carefully select every word in your title

If your key terms aren’t in the title of your journal article, chapter or publication, you’re basically opting out of search, so pick the exact words you would use if you were searching for your work on Google Scholar. Lift the core concepts straight from your argument, and avoid cute or obscure synonyms that no one will plug into search.

When I was growing up in academia, we all aspired to have a catchy title. These titles usually spoke to an insider joke or pop-culture moment. For example, I wanted to write a piece about the difficulty of using freedom-of-information tools in South Africa to aid historical research. I thought that the Rolling Stones’ You Can’t Always Get What You Want would be the classic opener here.

The boomers in my mentor group were tickled. Little did I know that I was turning the prime real estate in my proposed article into a joke. While I was trying to curry favour with senior scholars whose work had been first discovered in printed journals, delivered to departmental mailboxes, Scholar was quietly replacing printed journals as the locus of academic discovery. And in this new landscape, cleverness didn’t travel so well.

Searchability doesn’t stop at the title of your article. If your core terms only appear once, they’re decoration. If they appear consistently – in the first lines of your abstract and in your section headings – they become a signal. Sorry to be the fun police here, but Scholar is scanning for coherence, not wit.

2. Post a preprint 

Preprints offer an unfair advantage. Consider yourself to be your first and best publisher and promoter. Upload your work early and start circulating the link to your networks. Get indexed early and start accumulating citations before the journal version even lands.

You can always merge the articles later on Scholar to ensure your piece is adequately represented. Clear this with the editors before doing so, though, as a minority might be picky, especially in the social sciences. In the natural sciences, there is greater acceptance that the final version had a previous life.

3. Make sure your work is open access

The corporate publishing game is constantly pushing researchers to seclude their work behind paywalls or to pay for open access. While article processing charges (APCs) feel like the ultimate indignity at the end of this long, fraught process, it also makes no financial sense whatsoever for your findings to sit behind a wall. Depending on your line of research, you have probably spent a minimum of $20,000 producing your academic article. So that additional $3,000 to $5,000 is worth paying. 

If people can’t access your work, they can’t cite it. Scholar notices. Your work dies quietly in the night.

4. Clean up your Scholar profile

Your Google Scholar profile is not admin. It is part of the paper. If your name appears in three formats, your citations will fragment. If your preprint and published version of your papers aren’t merged, you split your impact. If your profile is missing papers, Scholar has less to work with.

Thankfully, Scholar gives you a fair amount of curatorial power. Most academics set their profile up once and forget it. That’s a mistake. Keep it clean, keep it consolidated, and make sure everything you produce is attached to you.

None of this is about gaming the system. It is the system.

If you care about shaping a field, you can’t just write. You have to think about how your work is discovered, circulated and cited.

Darshan Vigneswaran is associate professor of political science at the University of Amsterdam and founder of Spaceinterface.

If you would like advice and insight from academics and university staff delivered direct to your inbox each week, sign up for the Campus newsletter.