Across the divide: reimagining faculty-staff collaboration in higher education

When we talk about collaboration in higher education, we often mean interdisciplinary research or team-taught courses. Less visible – but equally consequential – is collaboration between faculty and professional staff. These relationships shape curriculum delivery, student success initiatives, community partnerships and the institution’s capacity to adapt in a rapidly changing environment.

The challenge to this kind of collaboration is not a lack of goodwill; faculty and professional staff are typically deeply committed to the same mission. The challenge is structural. Collaboration breaks down when roles are disconnected from shared outcomes – and it flourishes when institutions deliberately design work so that different forms of expertise are required to achieve clearly defined goals.

• Building bridges between academics and professional services
• How to integrate development pathways for higher education professionals
• Why process mapping matters in higher education

Faculty and professional staff often arrive with different training, incentives and assumptions about authority. Faculty roles are shaped by disciplinary expertise and academic autonomy; professional roles emphasise continuity, coordination and applied problem-solving across systems. Yet both groups navigate heavy workloads, increasing complexity and rising expectations. Effective collaboration begins when leaders acknowledge these differences while aligning work around outcomes that no single role can accomplish alone.

Start with outcomes, not org charts

In my experience as a department head and dean, faculty-staff collaboration is most effective when it is anchored in concrete, shared objectives rather than abstract calls for teamwork. When we ask teams to improve first-year transitions, expand experiential learning opportunities or strengthen community engagement, collaboration becomes a practical necessity rather than a cultural aspiration.

In these moments, roles clarify naturally. Faculty contribute disciplinary framing, academic standards and pedagogical intent. Professional staff contribute operational knowledge, external relationships, risk management and student-facing insight. When we treat those contributions as complementary rather than sequential, we move teams from coordination to co-creation.

Too often, professional staff are brought into initiatives after key academic decisions have been made. This limits their ability to shape outcomes and increases the likelihood of friction during implementation. Designing collaboration from the outset – by naming shared goals, clarifying decision-making authority and establishing timelines together – reduces misunderstanding and improves results.

Listening as an outcome-enabling practice

Listening is often framed as a leadership virtue but in faculty-staff collaboration it is also a functional tool. Leaders who listen across role boundaries gain access to information that rarely surfaces in formal governance structures.

Early in my deanship, I prioritised conversations with professional staff about where academic intent and operational reality collide. These discussions revealed gaps faculty leaders often do not see: where policies unintentionally create barriers for students, where processes undermine teaching goals or where small adjustments could unlock disproportionate impact.

Professional staff frequently hold long institutional memory and maintain networks that span departments, community partners and employers, enabling them to translate priorities across cultures and systems. Treating this insight as strategic knowledge – rather than downstream support – strengthens institutional decision-making.

Make collaboration explicit, not assumed

Collaboration rarely succeeds when it relies on informal relationships alone. Universities are complex organisations, and goodwill cannot overcome structural silos without intentional design.

Effective faculty-staff collaboration requires explicit agreements: what success looks like, who is responsible for which decisions, how information will flow, and how conflicts will be resolved. When these elements are left implicit, teams tend to default to assumptions shaped by role hierarchies rather than shared purpose.

Leaders play a critical role here. Including professional staff in early-stage planning signals that their expertise matters beyond implementation. It also helps align academic ambition with operational feasibility, reducing frustration on all sides.

Navigating change together

Periods of institutional change can either widen or bridge divides within university units. Faculty might see change as a potential shift in academic autonomy, while professional staff are often the ones navigating the practical realities of new systems, policies or resource constraints. When these perspectives are acknowledged and brought together, change can become an opportunity to strengthen collaboration and support both academic excellence and effective operations.

During these moments, collaboration depends on transparency and trust. Explaining not only what decisions are being made but how trade-offs were weighed and why certain paths were chosen helps maintain alignment across roles. Acknowledging workload pressures openly – and adjusting expectations where possible – signals respect and realism.

Practically, this means sequencing initiatives rather than stacking them, encouraging flexible work arrangements and normalising pauses when teams are stretched thin. Sustainable collaboration is not about constant momentum; it is about pacing work so people can contribute meaningfully over time.

Practical commitments for leaders

For leaders seeking to strengthen faculty-staff collaboration, I would distil these lessons into a few practical commitments:

• Anchor collaboration in shared outcomes and strategic planning. Frame faculty-staff partnerships around goals that require multiple forms of expertise to achieve.
• Design for early inclusion. Bring professional staff into planning conversations before decisions are finalised.
• Lead with role-aware listening. Treat staff insight as institutional intelligence, not merely operational support.
• Identify and explicitly value boundary-spanning work. Recognise those who translate across academic and administrative cultures.
• Model empathy and flexibility. Trust grows when people feel seen, supported and respected across roles.

Universities are not sustained by individual leaders or isolated units. They are sustained by teams of people who bring different kinds of expertise to a shared mission. When faculty and professional staff collaborate as genuine partners – aligned around outcomes, clear about roles and committed to mutual respect – institutions become more resilient, innovative and effective.

If we want our graduates to collaborate across difference in the world beyond university, we must first demonstrate what that looks like within our own walls.

Saskia van de Gevel is dean of the College of Natural Resources and Environment at Virginia Tech.

If you would like advice and insight from academics and university staff delivered direct to your inbox each week, sign up for the Campus newsletter.