Red card for global misconduct

Website dedicated to uncovering academic misconduct goes global. Elizabeth Gibney reports

June 13, 2013

In Romanian, the word “integru” is used to describe someone who is fair, honest, just and incorruptible. A new watchdog website,, hopes to clamp down on those scholars who don’t fit the bill.

The idea behind the site, which has been likened to a Wikipedia of plagiarism detection and went global last month, is that anyone can flag up work they suspect has been subject to academic misconduct and it will then be investigated by independent reviewers.

These reviewers – on whose time and generosity the site heavily relies – are chosen for academic expertise in their field. They look for flaws in the conduct (although not the content) of work, and their conclusions are published openly on the site.

Anyone can recommend a reviewer, although each is verified by site administrators, and anyone can suggest a case to investigate.

The idea is for the process to be open and peer-driven, said one of the founders, a researcher of Romanian nationality working outside the country who spoke to Times Higher Education on condition that he remained anonymous.

“It’s similar to the peer-review process for academic papers and very simple. Reviewers receive a link with a unique ID and see three questions. They answer, click ‘submit’ and that’s it,” he explained.

The idea has the same potential weaknesses (such as reviewer bias) as peer review, but it tries to avoid these by making the process open, with reviewers chosen by peers, not editors, and reviews published in full.

The website’s co-founder believes it is a way for academics to uphold the integrity of their fields in the absence of an international authority on research misconduct.

Created as a Romania-focused platform in August last year, has so far published 10 cases, with reviewers including David Tománek, professor of physics at Michigan State University, and Andrew Galloway, chair of the department of English at Cornell University.

Investigations, which have turned up alleged plagiarism in journal art-icles, PhD theses and grant applications, have included looking at work by Romania’s prime minister Victor Ponta and former education minister Ecaterina Andronescu.

The founder defended the website’s insistence on anonymity for its founders, saying it helped to protect from attacks on its credibility, which would harm the impact in countries where corruption levels are high.

The main reason for anonymity, however, was that the focus should be on named reviewers, who were “the only actual authority and public voice” behind the platform, he said.

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

question marks PhD study

Selecting the right doctorate is crucial for success. Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman share top 10 tips on how to pick a PhD

India, UK, flag

Sir Keith Burnett reflects on what he learned about international students while in India with the UK prime minister

Pencil lying on open diary

Requesting a log of daily activity means that trust between the institution and the scholar has broken down, says Toby Miller

Application for graduate job
Universities producing the most employable graduates have been ranked by companies around the world in the Global University Employability Ranking 2016
Retired academics calculating moves while playing bowls

Lincoln Allison, Eric Thomas and Richard Larschan reflect on the ‘next phase’ of the scholarly life