Apples and pears

March 30, 2017

Student experience is undeniably important, but comparing full-time campus-based learning to distance learning is like comparing apples and pears.

As we saw in the recent Times Higher Education Student Experience Survey 2017, trying to compare the two is impossible. This survey is fitting The Open University – a large, part-time distance-learning establishment – into a template designed for “full-time UK-based undergraduates” at face-to-face universities. The student experience and the expectations of full-time undergraduates on three-year, full-time courses is very different from that of part-time distance students balancing six years of study with work and family life.

More than 2 million students have studied with the OU since its establishment, and today we have in excess of 170,000 students who vary greatly in age and demographic. To try to suggest what the OU experience is like from a mere 54 students aged under 30 is highly misrepresentative. The OU study experience is much more than what the survey is evidencing.

As the OU approaches its 50th anniversary, we are more than ever putting students at the heart of everything we are doing and striving to ensure that our students’ experience is even more exceptional and fits with their needs.

Steve Hill
External engagement director
The Open University


Send to

Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan