UCU urges ministers to protect Teachers’ Pension Scheme

Union claims sector pensions are ‘under attack’ from ‘aggressive’ lobbying as disputes continue at post-92 institutions

Published on
March 26, 2026
Last updated
March 26, 2026
A HMRC letter head surrounded by British bank notes and coins
Source: iStock/marcyano

The University and College Union (UCU) has written to the government demanding ministers protect access to the Teachers’ Pension Scheme (TPS) for university staff, warning failure to intervene could lead to “irreparable damage”.

While post-92 universities are legally required to offer the pension to academics, a number of institutions – including Coventry, Staffordshire and Southampton Solent universities – have begun employing staff through subsidiary firms, meaning they are no longer obliged to offer the TPS. 

The TPS has an employer contribution rate of 28.68 per cent, which post-92 universities claim is too high and further exacerbates their financial issues. 

UCU’s general secretary Jo Grady has written to Bridget Phillipson, secretary of state for education, and Jacqui Smith, minister for skills, demanding that the government rules out any legislative changes that would allow universities to opt out of the TPS.

ADVERTISEMENT

Grady accused employer bodies of “aggressively” lobbying for these changes. 

She also said that the government must intervene to stop institutions using fire and rehire tactics to force staff out of the TPS and consider sanctioning employers for “anti-worker behaviour”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Grady added that policymakers should provide emergency financial support to help universities meet TPS contribution costs, similar to that already provided to schools and colleges. 

The letter notes that in the “last week alone” Sheffield Hallam University and London South Bank University have sought to “force” staff out of the TPS, while disputes relating to pensions continue at Southampton Solent and Northumbria universities, among others.  

“We need more direct government intervention in the sector than usual, but this is an exceptional moment. Failure to act will both see irreparable damage to higher education and severe weakening of TPS as a scheme, with wider fiscal ramifications,” the letter states. 

“Allowing university employers to dismantle our pensions unchecked would directly contradict the government’s stated commitment to treat higher education as a public good. Continued Treasury inaction risks looking less like neutrality and more like complicity in the systematic weakening of one of the UK’s last world-leading sectors.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Grady said that defined benefit pensions are a “vital part of employment in higher education” and the government “must act to defend them”.  

“University employers are accelerating attempts to erode pension security, using the current financial crisis as cover. If ministers are serious about treating higher education as a public good, they cannot stand by while employers strip away the retirement security, and steal the deferred wages, of staff.   

“We need to see a clear government position: no opt-outs from TPS, no fire-and-rehire to cut pensions, and proper financial support to sustain the scheme. Failure to act risks lasting damage not just to universities, but to a nationally important pension scheme.”

Staff at Northumbria University have been on strike this week following a dispute over pensions, after the university announced it would offer incentives to staff on the TPS to transfer to a pension scheme with a lower employer contribution rate. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The university claimed that the TPS was “significantly financially disadvantaging” post-92 universities. Take-up, however, has been slow

Meanwhile, Sheffield Hallam University caused controversy after it announced that only REF-eligible academics would be able to keep their TPS pensions, in a move the union claimed would “divide” the workforce and prevent teaching-focused academics from taking on research opportunities. 

ADVERTISEMENT

juliette.rowsell@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (1)

new
How odd if the Government bailed out the post-92 independent/private Us by meeting their high TPS costs (as it does for State schools as public bodies) but did not bail out the pre-92 independent/private Us when USS employer rates were similarly very high - and presumably nobody is suggesting that the independent/private schools have their high TPS costs met by the taxpayer (in fact most such schools have now left TPS). The UCU should be urging Government to allow the post-92 Us to ditch TPS and then move to USS so all HE academics are in the same pension scheme.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT