Yvette Cooper backs increased science spend with 3 per cent GDP target

Labour leadership candidate calls for 'revolution in science' and increased research and development spend

July 3, 2015

Labour leadership candidate Yvette Cooper will call for the UK to commit to almost doubling its science and R&D spend to 3 per cent of GDP.

On a day when she will visit the University of Manchester’s National Graphene Institute, Ms Cooper was set to call for a long-term framework for science funding as part of a plan to create more high-wage, high-skill jobs.

Ms Cooper will also take part in a Labour leadership hustings in Manchester alongside rivals Andy Burnham, Liz Kendall and Jeremy Corbyn.

Her speech was billed as advocating “a revolution in science and research” by her campaign, which also said she was calling for “a revolution in vocational skills, including supporting more University Technical Colleges, and continuing to innovate in apprenticeships and higher education”.

The agenda echoes that of Liam Byrne, Labour’s shadow universities science and skills minister, who is among Ms Cooper’s supporters in the leadership race.

Ms Cooper is expected to say: “We should be at the heart of a revolution in research and science investment. That’s why I will set a target of 3 per cent GDP for science and R&D investment. Just imagine what that would mean for our universities, our cities, our companies. That would transform our economy.”

The 3 per cent GDP target would bring the UK into line with Germany, her campaign said.

The UK spent 1.6 per cent of GDP on R&D in 2013, well behind Germany on 2.9 per cent, according to figures from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Ms Cooper adds: “When Manchester invented the new technologies of the industrial revolution, we turned them into jobs. Now we aren’t. China and the United States have done far more to turn Manchester’s great graphene invention into patents than we have here at home.”

And she continues: “If we were investing 3 per cent of our GDP in science that would give us the chance of 2 million more skilled manufacturing jobs for our country.

“Britain can’t compete with Brazil or Indonesia on low-wage, low skill jobs. But with high-skilled jobs in emergent technologies, in the digital revolution, in the shift to a post-carbon economy, in the harnessing of new technologies such as graphene, we can do what we’ve done before: punch well above our weight as a small island off the coast of Europe.”

Mr Byrne has previously argued that “universities help us…build a different type of economy, where there’s a bigger supply of better paid jobs in high-growth, high value-added sectors”.

john.morgan@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Related universities

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Vice-Chancellor THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL
Head of Visual Arts UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE
Research Officer - Big Data for Better Outcomes LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS & POLITICAL SCIENCE LSE

Most Commented

question marks PhD study

Selecting the right doctorate is crucial for success. Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman share top 10 tips on how to pick a PhD

India, UK, flag

Sir Keith Burnett reflects on what he learned about international students while in India with the UK prime minister

Pencil lying on open diary

Requesting a log of daily activity means that trust between the institution and the scholar has broken down, says Toby Miller

Application for graduate job
Universities producing the most employable graduates have been ranked by companies around the world in the Global University Employability Ranking 2016
Retired academics calculating moves while playing bowls

Lincoln Allison, Eric Thomas and Richard Larschan reflect on the ‘next phase’ of the scholarly life