Willetts criticises binary divide ‘curmudgeons’

David Willetts has criticised “curmudgeons” who call for the return of a binary divide between universities and polytechnics, while a Labour MP has said modern universities can teach older institutions a lesson.

March 6, 2013

The comments come in a Million+ publication launched today to celebrate the 21st anniversary of the 1992 Further and Higher Education Act, which transformed the polytechnics into universities.

Mr Willetts, the universities and science minister, writes: “I still come across curmudgeons who call for the old wall between different higher education institutions to be re-erected, but this is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the shape and complexity of modern higher education. Just as it is now impossible to see exactly where the Berlin Wall went, it is unthinkable to imagine cleaving our higher education sector in two again.”

The minister praises the legacy of polytechnics in pioneering modular courses, employer engagement, and expansion in student numbers.

But he adds that “they would have been called universities elsewhere in the world and the binary system was ripe for change by 1992. It is right to mark the 21st anniversary of the change in status by celebrating the universities’ continuing success”.

Although the binary divide is gone “some of the snobbery remains alive and kicking”, writes Caroline Gipps, former University of Wolverhampton vice-chancellor, and Pam Tatlow, Million+ chief executive, in their introduction to the publication, titled Breaking with Tradition.

Another contributor is Sadiq Khan, Labour’s shadow justice minister and a graduate of what is now London Metropolitan University.

He writes: “Some of our greatest universities are rightly applauded for their academic brilliance and they are up there with the best universities in the world, but I question how much they represent the vast talent of the British public.

“Modern universities on the other hand, whilst not often mentioned in the same breath as Oxford and Cambridge, arguably provide the tools to enable greater access to further and higher education. The ‘value added’ in some of these universities is impressive.”

And he also says: “I believe that modern universities can teach their more established forebears about running a truly modern educational institution.”

john.morgan@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Assistant Recruitment - Human Resources Office

University Of Nottingham Ningbo China

Outreach Officer

Gsm London

Professorship in Geomatics

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Professor of European History

Newcastle University

Head of Department

University Of Chichester
See all jobs

Most Commented

men in office with feet on desk. Vintage

Three-quarters of respondents are dissatisfied with the people running their institutions

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

As the country succeeds in attracting even more students from overseas, a mixture of demographics, ‘soft power’ concerns and local politics help explain its policy