Wikipedia contributors ‘should be proud’

Academics should be proud about the contributions they make to Wikipedia, instead of treating them like a “shameful secret”.

June 30, 2013

Wiki keys

That is the view of an academic who is to work as an ambassador for interaction between scholars and the online encyclopaedia.

Martin Poulter, new media manager in the School of Social and Community Medicine at the University of Bristol, said experts from across academia were helping to improve Wikipedia pages that cover topics in their areas of expertise, but that trumpeting such work was often frowned upon.

“Improving Wikipedia is an important way of promoting greater understanding among the general public about their own research areas,” he told Times Higher Education.

“An academic paper might be read by relatively few people, but Wikipedia articles reach a massive audience. It’s often the first place people look for information on a topic. Unfortunately, editing articles on Wikipedia is often regarded as a shameful secret.”

Dr Poulter, who is an active Wikipedia editor himself, is to head up a project that will aim to promote a better working relationship between academia and Wikimedia UK - the national charity that supports Wikipedia and its sister projects such as Wiktionary and Wikiversity.

It wants to encourage more experts to use their knowledge to improve the quality of theencyclopaedia’s articles, while at the same time helping them to ensure their work reaches a wider audience.

Among other activities, the £30,000 project – which is jointly funded by Wikimedia UK and Jisc, and will run for around nine months - will arrange events and briefings to help researchers to engage with Wikipedia.

Peter Findlay, Jisc programme manager, said: “Our communities have worked hard to develop academic rigour but equally Wikimedia’s community has developed a rigorous approach to publishing crowd-sourced knowledge; it makes perfect sense for us to join forces for the advancement of teaching, learning and research.”

chris.parr@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham