Warwick’s costs pass £100K as it foots Thomas Docherty’s legal bill

Picking up professor’s tab for defending himself in tribunal adds £66,000 to university’s expenses arising out of suspension

January 29, 2015

The University of Warwick has agreed to pay the £66,000 legal bill incurred by Thomas Docherty, the professor whom it suspended after claims that he had sighed and used negative body language towards his former boss.

Warwick’s payment of full costs for the professor of English and comparative literature puts the disclosed legal bill for the case at £109,000, including part of the university’s own spending. However, the university refuses to reveal its full legal bill.

Details of the legal bill will raise more questions about why Warwick proceeded so far with the case.

Professor Docherty, a prominent critic of the marketisation of higher education, was suspended in January 2014 and faced a university tribunal after being accused of undermining the authority of his former head of department, Catherine Bates. He was cleared of all charges by the tribunal in October.

It is understood that shortly before the tribunal was held, the university told Professor Docherty that it would be represented by barristers, prompting him to hire his own barrister and thus escalating costs.

Warwick told Times Higher Education last week in a statement that it would be paying Professor Docherty’s costs, which it put at £55,000 plus VAT.

Figures obtained by THE under the Freedom of Information Act had already showed a bill of £43,000 for part of the university’s costs: its spending on a barrister and the legal fees incurred by the tribunal.

However, Warwick refused to divulge its full costs. The university claimed that this was not possible, as it commissions legal services from solicitors SGH Martineau on an annual retainer and costs are not paid in reference to individual cases.

As THE revealed, the case against Professor Docherty cited three incidents, including sighing, projecting negative body language and making “ironic” comments when interviewing candidates for a job at Warwick.

Warwick said in a previous statement that it accepted that there were “lessons to be learned in terms of its processes and procedures”. It also denied that “the case was related to Professor Docherty’s academic work or the important principle of academic freedom”.

john.morgan@tesglobal.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Worried man wiping forehead
Two academics explain how to beat some of the typical anxieties associated with a doctoral degree

Felipe Fernández-Armesto takes issue with a claim that the EU has been playing the sovereignty card in Brexit negotiations

John McEnroe arguing with umpire. Tennis

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman explain how to negotiate your annual performance and development review

Man throwing axes

UCU attacks plans to cut 171 posts, but university denies Brexit 'the reason'

Cricket player and umpire exchanging bribe

The need to accommodate foreign students undermines domestic practices, says Lincoln Allison, spying parallels between UK universities and global sports bodies such as Fifa