Visa fraudsters ‘preying on’ London branch campuses

UK parent institutions face questions over their procedures and monitoring of capital operations

July 3, 2014

Source: PA

The heat is on: a Home Office letter to universities and colleges referred to a ‘concerted attack’ on institutions by criminal gangs

There are fears that London branch campuses run by UK universities could have been “targeted” by criminals running visa scams, as the Home Office investigates what it calls a “concerted attack” on institutions.

Concerns have also been raised within the sector about the government’s decision to name three universities in a statement on visa abuse – Glyndwr University, the University of Bedfordshire and the University of West London – when the last two had merely had their ability to sponsor new overseas students halted “pending further investigation”. In the past, some universities have suffered the tougher sanction of having their visa licences suspended without being named, it is understood.

James Brokenshire, the immigration minister, announced on 24 June that Glyndwr’s highly trusted sponsor status had been suspended. That was part of a wider statement on an investigation into “actions by organised criminals to falsify English language tests for student visa applicants”, following a BBC Panorama exposé about the firm Educational Testing Service.

It is thought that Home Office letters to universities and colleges affected by the announcement refer to a “concerted attack” on institutions by visa fraudsters.

Mr Brokenshire said in his statement that “much of the worst abuse” had occurred at London branch campuses run by universities, adding that the Quality Assurance Agency would hold an inquiry into the campuses “to see whether further action should be taken against their parent universities”.

A Times Higher Education analysis of the branch campuses (see box, below) shows that student numbers at the largest, that run by Glyndwr, have reached 1,705. The campuses are aimed mainly at non-EU students, and some are partnerships with private providers.

Pat Saini, head of immigration at law firm Penningtons, said that there were likely to be questions over visa procedures at London branch campuses and over monitoring by parent universities. “If a university has its base outside London, when it takes over a provider or sets up a branch campus, the big question is: have they adopted that provider’s processes and procedures, or have they put their own processes and procedures in?”

She added that in the Home Office’s eyes, “all the systems” at the London campus “need to mirror” those of the parent university, which remains the sponsor for all students. Asked if visa procedures at branch campuses were being maintained to that standard, Ms Saini said: “Obviously the Home Office and QAA think they may not be, hence there’s an investigation going on. It could be considered that the London campuses have been targeted…The institutions and the genuine students at these institutions, are they victims of this?”

The University of East Anglia announced in January that it would close its London campus in September. But the operation, run as a joint venture with private firm INTO, is now part of the QAA’s inquiry.

Edward Acton, UEA’s vice-chancellor, said: “Since one wants to have a watertight grip on the compliance of students that one sponsors, if it emerges [that] there is some feature of having a London campus that inherently introduces higher risk in this area I’m extremely glad we’ve resolved to focus our full attention on Norwich.”

Asked whether UEA had decided to shut the London campus because it saw visa problems coming, Professor Acton said that was not the case and said it was “much more a case of being extremely pleased and motivated by the quality of what Norwich can offer”.

The Home Office is believed to have focused its investigations on institutions with high numbers of recruits with ETS qualifications. But universities point out that ETS was among the test providers approved by the Home Office until earlier this year.

Credentials check

For pre-degree level study, institutions have to depend on a Home Office approved secure English language test, as this is the only evidence that will support a visa application for study at this level.

For degree-level study, institutions can accept secure English language tests or some other form of test, including in-house testing, to demonstrate that a student reaches the required level of English.

Professor Acton said the government had “mishandled” Mr Brokenshire’s statement. “There should have been very crystal clear affirmation of the overwhelming visa compliance of universities and university-sponsored students, instead of silence on that – and the kind of language that just risks spreading a smear…It could be stupidity, but one fears it’s deliberate.”

john.morgan@tsleducation.com

London campuses that will come ‘under the scope’ of the QAA’s inquiry

London campusYear openedNumber of students (non-EU) in 2013-14
Notes: The universities of Liverpool, Loughborough, Northumbria and South Wales have London campuses that are on the QAA list, but they have yet to open fully to students. The University of Cumbria’s London campus is also on the list, but it focuses on teacher training and has no non-EU students.
Anglia Ruskin – LCA Business School2000Did not provide data in time
Bangor Business School – London Centre201195 (93)
Coventry University London Campus2010867 (678)
University of East Anglia – UEA London2010321 (256)
Glasgow Caledonian University – GCU London2010244 (199)
Glyndwr University London20111,705 (1,644)
University of Sunderland London Campus20121,500 (all non-EU)
University of Ulster London Campus2011250 (no breakdown)
University of Wales Trinity Saint David-London2012434 (all non-EU)

 

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

whilst it is appreciated that UKBA and other watchdog agencies are cleaning up the system, it is those very agencies that approved ETS., which for me seriously questions and undermines their own approving systems and weaknesses in regular /follow up procedures for compliance( if there was any). Now suddenly those institutions that were "ok" to be used by students has become "not ok". And the genuine students and parent universities who relied on the system is penalized. I know sri lankan students who has gone through IELTS via the british council over here whose visa and CAS processes are now paused due to this developments in london. Why is IELTS questioned? why cant the UKBA keep the IELTS independent of these scrutiny. What is the benefit a genuine student get ( who has used IELTS in their home country via British council) for using the proper stipulated system ?.He /she is also victimized here by having a blanket approach to the whole saga by UKBA/Home office...sad

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

question marks PhD study

Selecting the right doctorate is crucial for success. Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman share top 10 tips on how to pick a PhD

India, UK, flag

Sir Keith Burnett reflects on what he learned about international students while in India with the UK prime minister

Pencil lying on open diary

Requesting a log of daily activity means that trust between the institution and the scholar has broken down, says Toby Miller

Microlight pilot flies with flock of cranes

Reports of UK-based researchers already thinking of moving overseas after Brexit vote

Portrait montage of Donald Trump and Nigel Farage

From Donald Trump to Brexit, John Morgan considers the challenges of a new international political climate