Vice-chancellors see a pay-your-way future as desirable, but students' opposition remains strong

October 17, 2003

With nearly every university set to introduce some form of top-up fees from 2006, THES reporters take a look at who is planning to charge what and why

Bernadette Porter, rector of the University of Surrey Roehampton, believes that top-up fees, with courses priced according to the cost of delivery, are a must for her institution to become a leading university in its own right, writes Alan Thomson.

She wants Roehampton to charge £3,000 for the costly lab-based subjects it teaches, including dance and media-related studies, and £2,000 for classroom-based courses such as English.

This will raise income to maintain quality, although discounting some courses will give Roehampton less than the £14 million it would get from charging each student £3,000, Dr Porter said. She wants a third of the extra income to fund bursaries for poor students.

The decision to charge top-ups from 2006 is vital to Dr Porter's vision for Roehampton. The institution, which already has degrees and research degree-awarding powers, has just commissioned a study on seeking full university status. Roehampton is federated to the University of Surrey. Dr Porter hopes that with university status it can become an autonomous and equal partner in the federation.

Dr Porter said: "Our lab-based subjects are in areas such as drama and media studies, which are very popular. It is market-led, but we would make the justification that this is about contributing to the real costs of students' education."

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns