US ‘national interest’ NSF research bill moves closer

The House of Representatives approves legislation that dictates NSF grants can be awarded only to projects in the ‘national interest’

February 15, 2016
Washington D.C.
Source: iStock

The US House of Representatives has passed a bill that would require the National Science Foundation (NSF) to award grants only for research projects that are “in the national interest”.

The legislation, which was approved after a vote of 236 to 178, includes seven definitions of research that would be classed in this way. These include research that has the “potential” to achieve “increased partnerships between academia and industry”, the “promotion of the progress of science” and the “development of an American STEM workforce” that is “globally competitive”.

It would also include research that could lead to “increased economic competitiveness” in the US, the “advancement of the health and welfare of the American public”, “increased public literacy and public engagement with science and technology” and “support for the national defense of the US”.

The bill states that the public announcement of each award of federal funding must include written justification as to how the grant meets these requirements.

Almost all of those who voted in favour of the bill are Republicans while Democrats largely rejected the legislation.

However, the White House issued a statement of administration policy threatening to veto the bill, stating that it would “needlessly” add to “bureaucratic burdens and overhead” at the NSF and “replace the clarity of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 with confusing language that could cast a shadow over the value of basic research”.

In December 2014, the NSF revised its guidelines to state that a “nontechnical project description” must explain the significance and importance of each project and serve as “public justification” for NSF funding by articulating how the project “serves the national interest”.

The bill’s sponsor and chairman of the House science committee Lamar Smith said that the legislation “makes this commitment permanent”.

However, according to The Chronicle of Higher Education, an NSF spokeswoman said that the agency stands by the administration’s statement threatening a veto of the bill.

ellie.bothwell@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Analyst

Greenwich School Of Management Ltd

PhD Research Fellow in Medical Physics

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Senior Knowledge Officer

European Association For International Education

Postdoctoral position in Atmospheric and Space Physics

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu
See all jobs

Most Commented

Doctoral study can seem like a 24-7 endeavour, but don't ignore these other opportunities, advise Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman

Matthew Brazier illustration (9 February 2017)

How do you defeat Nazis and liars? Focus on the people in earshot, says eminent Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt

Improvement, performance, rankings, success

Phil Baty sets out why the World University Rankings are here to stay – and why that's a good thing

Warwick vice-chancellor Stuart Croft on why his university reluctantly joined the ‘flawed’ teaching excellence framework

people dressed in game of thrones costume

Old Germanic languages are back in vogue, but what value are they to a modern-day graduate? Alice Durrans writes