Universities oppose external examining reforms

Higher Education Funding Council for England says proposals will be reviewed but wins broad support for principles

November 30, 2015
This Way, That Way, Another Way road signs

Plans to give external examiners a stronger role in monitoring higher education standards will be reviewed after attracting more opposition than support from universities.

Results of the consultation on the future of quality assessment in England, Wales and Northern Ireland reveal that 40 per cent of higher education institutions that responded said they disagreed or strongly disagreed with proposals to introduce UK-wide training for examiners and to create a national register. Only 32 per cent were in favour.

In contrast, the proposals attracted 90 per cent support from student organisations, and were backed by 83 per cent of professional bodies.

The Higher Education Funding Council for England, which conducted the consultation, said that many of the concerns raised were practical, rather than matters of principle. Key issues included the need to protect institutional autonomy, and the potential extra burden on providers.

But mission groups have previously warned that a UK-wide system of external examining “could begin to appear as very similar in make-up to a national inspectorate” and could “drive away the very academics best positioned to help universities improve”.

This was not the only area of significant opposition to emerge in the consultation, with 35 per cent of higher education institutions disagreeing with proposals that would require governing bodies to vouch for academic standards at their institutions. Forty-two per cent were in favour.

Concerns focused on the need to maintain the separation of responsibilities between boards and senates, which oversee academic standards, and governing bodies; and the capabilities of governors, many of whom are recruited for their expertise in areas outside higher education.

Susan Lapworth, Hefce’s registrar, said that the results revealed broad support for the funding council’s proposals, which envisage the abolition of institutional reviews for established providers. The ending of repeated testing of established providers against baseline academic standards was supported by 63 per cent of respondents, and Hefce’s overall principles on the proposals were supported by 79 per cent of all respondents, and were opposed by only 8 per cent.

But Ms Lapworth acknowledged that the proposals on external examining and governing bodies should be revisited, particularly in light of the strong student support for the changes to external examining.

“Our overriding impression on both of these areas is that there is scope for more discussions with key stakeholders to talk about their views and their concerns, and to work out how we sensibly move forward,” she said.

Pam Tatlow, chief executive of the Million+ mission group, which represents newer universities, said that Hefce had manoeuvred itself into a “cul-de-sac” that it needed to “reverse out of”.

“Hefce appears to have got itself into a double bind, but it would be unwise to ignore the views of universities,” Ms Tatlow said. “Governing bodies are accountable for their institutions but this is not the same as making judgements about academic quality.

“Administrative and bureaucratic burdens will increase with the teaching excellence framework and the case made by Hefce for major reform of the external examiners’ system looks even less attractive.”

chris.havergal@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Universities oppose plans to boost role played by external examiners

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

question marks PhD study

Selecting the right doctorate is crucial for success. Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman share top 10 tips on how to pick a PhD

Pencil lying on open diary

Requesting a log of daily activity means that trust between the institution and the scholar has broken down, says Toby Miller

India, UK, flag

Sir Keith Burnett reflects on what he learned about international students while in India with the UK prime minister

Application for graduate job
Universities producing the most employable graduates have been ranked by companies around the world in the Global University Employability Ranking 2016
Construction workers erecting barriers

Directly linking non-EU recruitment to award levels in teaching assessment has also been under consideration, sources suggest