Universities creating generation of ‘wuss’ lawyers, says professor

Students may crumble in court if they’re not exposed to ‘disturbing’ ideas, George Washington University academic claims

December 1, 2016
John Banzhaf at Judiciary hearing
Source: Alamy
John Banzhaf: ‘lawyers must stand up to tremendous pressures. If they are wusses…the consequences can be serious’

The decision by the University of Michigan’s law school to schedule a “post-election self-care” event – involving Play-Doh, Lego and bubble-blowing – to help students cope with the stress of Donald Trump’s victory has led a leading law scholar to accuse US schools of raising a generation of “wuss” lawyers.

Despite the later cancellation of the event featuring Michigan’s “embedded psychologist”, its mere suggestion angered John Banzhaf, professor of public interest law at George Washington University, who said that law students’ becoming more “wussified or wimpy” could have serious implications.

“This is not isolated to law schools. We have the same kind of problems occurring at all universities, all colleges,” he told Times Higher Education. “Also, there is a big difference with dealing with undergraduates, who typically are 18 or 19 years old, away from home for the first time. They are [perhaps] more fragile, more likely to be subject to stress and so on.

“In [law schools’] case, we’re talking about students [who have] gone at least four years [at] undergraduate [level]; some of them have done additional education or have taken time off and worked in the real world. So this is happening with [students] who are typically 23, 24; it’s much more disturbing.”

While society does not “demand that much fortitude” from some academic courses, he added, it is crucial for lawyers in the US, he claimed.

Professor Banzhaf is renowned in the US legal world for his tenacity, especially in high-profile cases against the tobacco industry and McDonald’s. He was a key figure in Morgan Spurlock’s film about McDonald’s, Super Size Me, and is cited in Spurlock’s book for his pugnacious legal techniques. His students have been referred to as “Banzhaf’s Bandits” and his legal activism course is idiomatically known as “Sue the Bastards”.

“We depend on lawyers to stand up to tremendous pressures, to judges who will try to shut them down, very strong opposing counsel, and community pressures if you’re defending an unpopular defendant or cause,” he said. “If they are wusses, if they’re more likely to back down to pressure. The consequences are more serious.”

Professor Banzhaf said this culture was not new, and instances of “wussified” students go back over 10 years. He noted claims by Alan Dershowitz, emeritus professor of law at Harvard University, that some colleagues “were not teaching the law of rape because of student pressure”.

“Some of them, because we do depend to some extent on student evaluations, said: ‘I don’t need that pressure, I’m just not going to teach rape.’ If you don’t teach rape, you have a whole generation of students who don’t understand the law of rape, which makes it very difficult for them to go out and prosecute or defend,” he said.

Professor Banzhaf said there are now surveys showing “many students think it’s OK to prohibit speech which might be harmful, upsetting or disturbing”, something he believes goes counter to the key aims of higher education.

“To expose people to unpopular thoughts, the ones that are contrary to the way they grew up, will be disturbing – but that’s the whole point of higher education,” he said. “[Our campuses] should be a bastion and bedrock of protection for free speech.”

Besides the serious practical repercussions, he said, he worried that it could affect academic work on increasing our wider understanding of important societal concerns.

“Law professors tend to do legal research in the areas that we teach. We think that if we do research in area X, it will help us explain and provide real experiences in our classrooms,” he said. “If we’re no longer teaching the law of rape, it’s quite natural that professors who otherwise might be doing research into it will be less likely to do so.”

john.elmes@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham