UK university staff offered pay rise of 2 per cent

Annual talks between employers and unions end with offer marginally better than last year amid ‘bleak future’ for some institutions

Published on
May 18, 2026
Last updated
May 18, 2026
Pay slip
Source: iSTock/nesneJkraM

Annual pay talks have concluded with employers offering UK university staff a rise of 2 per cent, warning that “the near future looks bleak” for several institutions.  

The Universities and Colleges Employers Association (Ucea) has announced its “full and final” pay offer for 2026-27, warning trade unions that there continues to be a “challenging financial backdrop”, with liquidity levels in the sector “set to worsen further”.

A letter sent at the end of the three scheduled meetings held as part of the pay review process outlined a proposal that would see a 2 per cent uplift implemented for most staff from 1 August 2026. 

The offer is a slight improvement on last year’s rise of 1.4 per cent for most staff, which was implemented by universities despite both sides failing to reach an agreement.  

ADVERTISEMENT

The University and College Union (UCU) and the other sector unions had been pushing for a pay uplift of 3 per cent plus the Retail Prices Index (RPI) of inflation, which would equate to a rise of roughly 7 per cent in total, or £3,000, depending on which was greater.

Ucea’s chief executive Raj Jethwa writes: “As you will be aware the sector’s financial position remains worrying, as reflected in the House of Commons Education Select Committee report…For many institutions, both domestic and international student recruitment remains challenging and for several institutions the near future looks bleak.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Universities will continue to be able to defer the pay award by up to 11 months, without back pay, if it is “determined to be in the wider interests of the institution’s sustainability or due to immediate cashflow issues”.

Ucea rejected calls by the joint unions to make universities living wage employers, as “it is a matter for individual institutions to determine” and also rejected calls to introduce a minimum wage rate of £15 per hour. The association said the pay offer “is at the limit of the sector’s affordability” and consequently this request “[was] not possible”.

It reaffirmed its commitment to a joint review of the sector pay spine and committed to “time-limited negotiations” to seek an agreement, which if reached would be introduced from August 2027.

It agreed to take forward further discussions, outside the pay negotiations, on career pathway guidance for professional services staff, and proposed updating its guidance on job security to emphasise “good practice being followed by employers in managed restructuring and redundancy exercises”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nishan Canagarajah, chair of Ucea, said the magnitude of challenges in the sector “faced by both sides [is] extremely testing”. 

“This full and final pay offer results in a significant financial challenge for the [higher education institutions] we represent and we appreciate the sector support for this pay uplift. But we also acknowledge and understand that for some HEIs this uplift will simply not be possible. Unfortunately, financial circumstances have deteriorated further since the consultation at the start of the year.” 

Raj Jethwa, Ucea’s chief executive, added that the uplift does not “reflect the true value employers place on staff, but unfortunately it is the best we can offer given the severity of the financial pressures facing the sector”. 

“We believe that our trade union colleagues are equally concerned by these sector challenges. Increasing numbers of HE institutions face financial deficit and difficult restructuring decisions and so the final offer considered this. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“I would add that we have had productive discussions and negotiations which have helped employers to make offers on a number of items included in the unions’ claim.” 

juliette.rowsell@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

So its another real wage cut inflation at 3.3% pay rise 2%......meanwhile Brexit voting pensioners get the triple lock. And of course taxes continue to adversely affect real take home pay as the tax thresholds remain unchanged.
2% is in no sense a 'meaningful uplift' given current inflation - it is in fact a real-terms pay cut yet again. Everybody understands the financial constraints, but UCEA and Jethwa's words would be easier to take if real-wages hadn't been so aggressively squeezed even when financial times were better. Do UCEA have a plan to work towards an increase in real wages at some point? Or will HE staff just keep getting poorer and substantially devalued compared to the wider economy? Will a TimesHE journalist ask UCEA this, or just copy and paste statements from UCEAs website? Also, hidden away in annex B of the 'offer' is the suggestion that UCEA want to 'explore the basis for pay progression between spine points' in any pay spine review- which, given it is currently based on time served, could be quite a substantial change. Any chance of pressing UCEA on that too?

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT