UK researchers face uncertainty over EU grant applications

Brexit vote leads some European researchers to conclude joint bids with UK academics are now too risky

June 29, 2016
Helga Nowotny
Helga Nowotny, former president of the European Research Council

UK academics could face dwindling chances of winning European research grants following the vote to leave the European Union last week, according to the former president of the European Research Council.

Helga Nowotny made the comments as it became clear that the Brexit vote has thrown future UK participation in multibillion-euro research programmes into doubt, with some European researchers saying that they would now no longer launch joint applications with UK colleagues.

For now, no rules have changed, and UK academics are still able to bid for grants as part of the EU’s €70 billion (£58 billion) Horizon 2020 programme.

But with the prospect of the UK leaving the EU in the next few years and no certainty over the terms, Professor Nowotny said that “given the lengthy procedure of applications being evaluated, negotiated…it might well be that the willingness to deal with UK applications just as before, might be on the wane”.

“In any case, Brexit is bad for UK science, for European science and for all of us. Like in sports, once a high-level competitor is lost, the game also suffers. Overall quality may decrease, and it will also be less fun to compete,” she said.

The uncertainty has already prompted some European researchers to state that they would not now risk a joint grant bid with UK academics. Björn Brembs, a neurobiologist at the University of Regensburg, said that he had “plenty of friends and colleagues in GB with whom even the potential of a collaborative grant now seems gone”.

Pasi Vahimaa, a physics professor at the University of Eastern Finland, said on Twitter: “Just in case it might be better to exclude UK partners in near future H2020 applications.”

Cameron Neylon, a professor of research communications at Curtin University, said that he was now having doubts about putting in a bid for a grant this summer.

“In the end, any proposal is a judgement call; success rates are not high so you’ve got to judge whether it’s worth the effort for the chance of success. Uncertainty weighs pretty heavily in that calculation,” he said.

It has been suggested that the UK’s future participation in EU research programmes may turn on whether a new deal with the EU allows for free movement of people, a crucial campaign issue that has split victorious pro-Brexit politicians.

Iain Gillespie, pro vice-chancellor for research and enterprise at the University of Leicester, said: “Certainly we at Leicester and many of our colleagues in other universities are urging our researchers to continue to engage in Europe and in European bids. That’s a message that we will keep pushing at.”

But he added: “The challenge is going to be getting researchers who have not much engaged in Europe so far to do so now under these conditions of uncertainty. Nailing European grants can be an awful lot of work, which can pay off in the end, but if the end is very uncertain then why make the investment?”

A spokesman for the European Research Council said that “for the time being…nothing changes”.

“EU law continues to apply to the full to the UK and in the UK until it is no longer a member. Regarding the future impact on research funding, it is far too early to speculate on this question,” he continued. “That will be addressed in due course, once negotiations with the UK begin on its withdrawal agreement as well as on the agreement concerning its future relationship with the EU.”

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham

The University of Aberdeen

Tim Ingold and colleagues at the University of Aberdeen have created a manifesto that they hope will preserve higher education's true values

Interactive app at natural history museum

If the outcomes of ‘active learning’ are so much better than those for traditional lectures, why stick with the old format? asks Simone Buitendijk