UK academic denied US entry over Sudan field trip

King’s College London scholar says that ‘a growing tide’ of academics now recognise that scientific meetings can no longer be held in the US

October 22, 2018
us-customs
Source: Getty

A British academic who was denied entry to the US because she had conducted fieldwork in Sudan has claimed that the US has become a no-go area for hosting scientific meetings.

Katie Manning, an archaeologist at King’s College London, was due to give a plenary speech at the Cultural Evolution Society’s annual conference in Arizona this week, but she cannot now attend because her application for an Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) was rejected.

Dr Manning told Times Higher Education that she was denied entry on the basis that she had travelled to Sudan to conduct fieldwork in 2014.

She said that she had been to the US numerous times since the Sudan trip, but the US has tightened its policy around allowing entry to visitors who have travelled to six majority-Muslim countries covered by the Trump administration’s “travel ban”.

“Having looked into it subsequently, I believe that if you have been there on military service or as a journalist, then your ESTA is likely to be granted,” she said. However, Dr Manning continued, there was no option to declare that she had travelled to the country as an academic and there was no way to appeal the decision.

“A lot of these countries are the cornerstone of early civilisation…It’s not that surprising that an African archaeologist visits some of these countries,” she said. “The inability to add any further detail to me just seems utterly ludicrous.”

Dr Manning added that visitors who are denied an ESTA may apply for a full visa, but the process can take several weeks.

“Considering that I didn’t book my flights until two months before the trip, this is the sort of planning that is unrealistic in any academic work life and any academic schedule. Often, you don’t agree to give talks until a couple of months before,” she said.

“This whole process is making attendance at any scientific meetings in the States incredibly difficult.”

Based on feedback she received after sharing her situation on Twitter, she said that there was a “growing tide of people recognising that scientific meetings just can’t be held in the States”.

Robert Boyd, professor in the School of Human Evolution and Social Change at Arizona State University and a member of the Cultural Evolution Society, told THE that Dr Manning was now due to deliver her speech by video, even though “this is a poor substitute for being able to interact with her here in Tempe”.

“Meetings play an important role in science because they allow investigators normally spread across the world to chat, brainstorm, create new friendships and renew older ones. Visa restrictions will make such meetings much more difficult, and so damage science as a whole,” he said.

“I will not be directly involved in organising the next meeting in 2020, but I am currently a member of the executive committee of the society and plan to argue that further meetings of the society should be scheduled outside the US until my country fixes its visa system.”

Eric Huysecom, associate professor of archaeology at the University of Geneva and president of the Society of African Archaeologists, said that the society’s biennial conference, which took place in June, was moved from New York to Toronto because it was “no longer possible to organise an Africanist international congress in the US”.

“This would automatically imply the exclusion of some of our African colleagues from countries declared non grata by the US, or even all Western or African colleagues working in these same countries, as well as the boycott of all colleagues who would be in solidarity,” he said.

ellie.bothwell@timeshighereducation.com

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Related articles

Reader's comments (3)

The respective change to the Visa Waiver Program was implemented already under the Obama administration, and not by Trump. Not qualifying for a Visa Waiver is very different from being denied entry. There is no obvious reason why a visa (or entry to the US) should be denied, and no "visa restrictions" apply to this case. Citizens of the vast majority of countries do not qualify for the Visa Waiver Program. The scientist in question appears to have failed to inform herself about the entry requirements and sort out visa in time for attending the conference. Note: I am affected by this policy myself and now hold a B1/B2 visa.
It might be best to organise conferences outside of the United States to avoid such situations arising...
To rebut martindominik: 1. It’s a rotten US policy – the individuals responsible are irrelevant. 2. Clearly the ESTA rejection was the means of denying entry in this case. 3. Citizens of the UK do qualify for the Visa Waiver Program - it is ridiculous to revoke this merely for a past visit to Sudan for academic field work. 4. Falling victim to an injustice yourself is an absurd basis for inflicting the same injustice on others.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October

Sponsored