The right to say no to the auditors

February 6, 1998

As chair of the British Association for American Studies I have been pressing the Quality Assurance Agency to take account of the view of Americanists in their new plans for subject expert teams (Dearing recommendation 25), now apparently called subject benchmarking teams.

It was good to receive an invitation to be briefed by the QAA on the latest developments in their post-Dearing work on subject standards and to be provided with an opportunity "to contribute to the consideration and refinement of the methodology of the subject expert teams". It was not so good to discover that we would be charged Pounds 45 for the privilege. Shouldn't it be the other way round?

Judie Newman

British Association for American Studies University of Newcastle upon Tyne

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October

Sponsored

Featured jobs

Finance Analyst

Bpp University

HR Adviser

University Of The West Of Scotland

Catering Assistant

Edinburgh Napier University