Sussex outsourcing opposition grows

Academic opposition to outsourcing at the University of Sussex is building, with staff from ten schools, departments and research centres publishing statements supporting protests at the institution.

April 21, 2013

Occupational hazards: registrar says centre staff do not welcome protest

Departments have increasingly voiced support for the protests since the eviction on 2 April of an eight-week-long student occupation against outsourcing. Together, the statements are signed by more than 140 individual faculty and staff.

The School of Education and Social Work, the School of English, the School of Media, Film and Music and the School of History, Art History and Philosophy, have all expressed their support.

The latter said the undersigned staff “deplore the management’s refusal to engage in…dialogue and its decision instead to evict the protesters occupying the Conference Centre, and to use a court order to ban future protests”.

Other statements have come from the Department of Sociology and the Department of International Relations, as well as the Centre for Gender Studies, the Institute of Development Studies, the Centre for Social and Political Thought and the Centre for Cultural Studies.

Members of Unison, the University and College Union and Unite have all launched consultations asking members whether they would in principle be prepared to take industrial action over what they call the university’s failure to properly consult over its plans. All three consultations will end on 25 April.

Students also voted to campaign against the outsourcing at the institution. In a University of Sussex Students’ Union referendum, published on 18 April, 70 per cent of voting students (1,264) said the union should campaign against the outsourcing plans, compared to 548 who voted against.

Plans to transfer 235 estates and catering jobs to private companies were announced in May last year.

An occupation protesting against the proposal was evicted after the university was granted an injunction over the campus, following a protest on 25 March.

Meanwhile four Sussex students who were arrested on the day of eviction appeared at Brighton Magistrates Court on 18 April.

Three were charged with obstructing a police officer and one was charged with criminal damage.

Lydia Dagostino, a solicitor acting on behalf of the students, said that all pleaded not guilty and that a trial date in the criminal damage case had been set for 9 September.

Read John Duffy’s arguments for and Gurminder Bhambra’s arguments against Sussex outsourcing.

elizabeth.gibney@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

Michael Farthing, Sussex VC, is formerly a Board of Governers member at Kingston University, and Principal at St. George's Medical School, which is affiliated with Kingston. Use your own imagination to work out how he learned his latest management tactics.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (8 September 2016)

Some lecturers will rightly encourage forms of student interaction that are impossible for those covering their faces, Eric Heinze argues

University of Oxford students walking on campus

University of Oxford snatches top spot from Caltech in this year’s World University Rankings as Asia’s rise continues

Handwritten essay on table

Universities must pay more attention to the difficulties faced by students, says Daniel Dennehy

Theresa May entering 10 Downing Street, London

The prospect of new grammar schools on the horizon raises big questions for HE, writes Nick Hillman

Nosey man outside window

Head of UK admissions service Mary Curnock Cook addresses concerns that universities might ‘not hear a word’ from applicants