Sussex ‘sell-off’ stirs union ire

The University and College Union has condemned plans by the University of Sussex to “privatise” some 235 of the 2,200 jobs at the institution.

May 19, 2012

Last week, Sussex announced plans for private companies to take over the management of its estates, facilities, catering and conference services from August 2013.

Unions were informed just a day before the university went public with the decision on 10 May.

A spokesman for the UCU condemned the move, suggesting it was a knee-jerk reaction to funding difficulties.

“Selling off parts of an institution to private companies is not good for the institution and certainly not for the staff,” he told Times Higher Education. “Private companies looking to drive down costs to maximise profits will be looking at staff pay and their terms and conditions to cut corners and save cash.”

Under employment regulations, staff would be transferred to the companies on their current terms and conditions. Areas affected include cleaning, catering, print and reprographic services, recycling management, security and grounds management.

In a statement to staff, John Duffy, Sussex’s registrar and secretary, says that the move is not about cutting workers, but about providing for greater numbers of students in the future.

“As we grow, we need to ensure we provide support services to our students and staff as efficiently and effectively as possible – making best use both of public funding and, increasingly, of our students’ own investment,” he says.

In a letter to Michael Farthing, Sussex’s vice-chancellor, on 14 May, the University of Sussex Students’ Union voices its concerns that the proposals could have a negative impact on student welfare, the affordability of services, accountability and ethics.

It calls on Professor Farthing to outline how he will ensure that the move does not lead to a two-tier wage structure, with transferred staff working for less cash and in less favourable conditions than those in areas still run by the university.

Sussex plans to choose its private partners by March next year.

elizabeth.gibney@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan