Stephen Hawking professorship at Cambridge approved

But 600 vote against amid discontent over salary plans

February 25, 2014

Controversial plans to create a Stephen Hawking professorship at the University of Cambridge have been passed, despite concerns over the salary that will be paid.

Members of Cambridge’s governing Regent House voted in favour of accepting a $6 million (£3.63 million) donation to fund the post by 746 votes to 606, the university announced on 25 February.

It means the Stephen W. Hawking professorship of cosmology will be established on 1 March thanks to the gift from the Avery-Tsui Foundation, set up by the late US philanthropist Dennis Avery, who was a personal friend of Professor Hawking and the heir to a family fortune made in peel-off labels.

However, the relatively close ballot reflects the considerable opposition to the new chair, whom critics say is likely to be paid about double the amount paid to other Cambridge professors, equating to a salary of £140,000 a year.

Opponents had claimed the terms of the Avery-Tsui Foundation donation, which provides about $4 million for an additional salary supplement of £67,000 on top of the basic $2 million endowment, posed a “threat to meritocracy” and would set a precedent for donors to demand “special arrangements” in return for their money.

Gill Evans, emeritus professor in medieval theology at Cambridge, said donors will now be able to press for special deals regardless of the university’s stated policies.

“It could lead to all sorts of problems and future votes,” she said, adding that whoever got the post “may be in for a rough time from resentful colleagues” wanting to know “why they are worth so much more than anyone else”.

Under the terms of the donation, the salary of the incoming chair must be “equal to or greater than the average salary and benefits” for other professors “of similar years of service, or rank” in the department of applied mathematics and theoretical physics.

A spokesman for Cambridge said the chair would now be established as it had been approved by the Regent House.

jack.grove@tsleducation.com

Already registered?

Sign in now if you are already registered or a current subscriber. Or subscribe for unrestricted access to our digital editions and iPad and iPhone app.

Reader's comments (3)

In the British system of egalitarian and merit-based salaries, this is indeed an anacronism. It would not pass comment in the US of course, and the successful candidate would not attract snarky comments. One hopes the chair holder will distribute largesse to the other staff via a potlatch system, or donate to charity. Or at least invite colleagues to his or her new Tuscany villa. Because I fail to see how earning more personal salary creates better mathematics. Now, an endowment for research support would be another matter.
It can help attract better people, who, by definition, will create better mathematics. That's how.
Unless the candidates for this position realise that they may be asked to account for the extra support channeled into the named professorship, which could be a distraction to a mathematical mind?

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Academic Director CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN & INTERNATIONAL STUDIES
Lecturer in Politics & International Relations UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE (MAIN ADDRESS)
Research Grant Capture Team Administrator NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY

Register to continue  

You've enjoyed reading five THE articles this month. Register now to get five more, or subscribe for unrestricted access.

Most Commented

Globalisation

Times Higher Education World University Rankings data reveal the top 200 most outward-looking institutions

Common cactus finch (Geospiza scandens)

Tiffany Taylor on a thought-provoking view of the forces acting to ensure survival

Student asking question during class

University of Reading research finds link between undergraduate satisfaction and ethnicity of lecturers

Stressed businessman answering four telephones

Some surveys show faculty putting in at least 60 hours a week, but research casts doubt on whether this is a productive routine

Level of quality compass

Authors argue this means universities should spend less on senior academics and give promising younger scholars more of a chance