Scottish fee questions raised by pro-union campaign

It is “hard to see” how an independent Scotland could legally continue to charge students from the rest of the UK tuition fees

January 13, 2014

The claim has come from the pro-union Better Together campaign in a report attacking the credibility of plans for Scottish higher education post-independence.

Excelling Together: The future of Scotland’s universities, written by academics who support the pro-union campaign, also questions why Scottish universities would be allowed to continue to draw access the UK’s research council funding.

Last November, the Scottish government published its blueprint for independence, which insisted that Scotland would be allowed by European Union law to charge tuition fees to students from the rest of the UK.

But the Better Together report argues this approach would run into “significant problems” legally.

“If Scotland leaves the UK, and joins the EU as a separate state, the rest of the UK will become like any other European Union country. As a result, Scotland will be legally obliged to provide university education to students from England, Wales and Northern Ireland,” it continues.

Currently, because Scottish domiciled students are not charged any tuition fees, EU students have to be treated the same, and so can also attend for free.

The report quotes Paul Beaumont, professor of European Union and private international law at the University of Aberdeen, as saying: “It is hard to see the Court of Justice of the EU accepting the Scottish Government’s arguments as to how this overt discrimination against students from the UK can be justified.

“There is therefore a substantial hole in the Scottish Government’s plans for funding higher education in Scotland.”

Another crucial issue after independence would be research income. At the moment, Scottish universities win more funding from UK-wide research bodies than they would if it was allocated according to population.

The Scottish government has argued that after independence, it would be “clearly in the interests of both Scotland and the rest of the UK to maintain a common research area including shared research councils, access to facilities and peer review”.

But the Better Together report says that it would be “difficult to imagine a situation where the rest of the UK would continue to allow a net outflow of scarce research funding to what would then be a foreign country”.

“In any case it would become increasingly difficult to operate an effective single system over time” as regulations and legal frameworks diverged, it adds.

david.matthews@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride