Scotland's draft governance code ‘weak and meaningless'

A new draft code of governance for Scottish universities has been condemned as “weak”, “meaningless in places” and offering “nothing new” by student and academic unions north of the border.

April 16, 2013

The code, drawn up the chairs of Scottish universities’ governing bodies, makes recommendations on issues included the composition of remuneration committees and equality and diversity targets.

Some of the code’s recommendations include:

- Committees should be “careful” not to agree to severance payments for staff “which staff, students and the public might reasonably deem excessive”

- Remuneration committees should include three independent members

- These committees should produce a report with “sufficient detail of the broad criteria and policies” used to award pay levels

- Governing bodies must establish goals on the “equality and diversity” of their composition

- The proceedings of the governing body should only be withheld if they relate to “confidentiality relating to individuals, the wider interest of the Institution or the public interest demands”

The code was drawn up following a recommendation by a report into university governance chaired by Ferdinand von Prondzynski, principal of Robert Gordon University, released in January 2012.

But none of the von Prondzynski report’s most significant recommendations, including quotas for women on governing boards, more staff and student representation on boards, and a ban on bonuses for vice-chancellors, have made it into the draft code.

Robin Parker, chairman of the National Union of Students Scotland, said: “We always said having university chairs making up their own code on governance would risk a weak code. It now seems this risk has been realised.

“The original von Prondzynski review came up with a set of recommendations which the sector as a whole signed up to.

“The code of governance was meant to find a way to apply these across the sector. Instead, what we’ve seen is those recommendations being cherry picked and watered down to become almost meaningless in places,” Mr Parker added.

The Educational Institute of Scotland, one of the unions that represents academic staff in the country, said that it was “disappointed” with the code, “as it seems to offer nothing new to improve HE governance or accountability”.

“In fact the main aim of the draft code seems to reinforce the autonomy of universities and consolidate existing power structures,” a statement from the union said.

Universities Scotland described it as a “progressive code which would set Scotland’s universities at the leading edge of accountable governance amongst all of Europe”.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Assistant Recruitment - Human Resources Office

University Of Nottingham Ningbo China

Outreach Officer

Gsm London

Professorship in Geomatics

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Professor of European History

Newcastle University

Head of Department

University Of Chichester
See all jobs

Most Commented

men in office with feet on desk. Vintage

Three-quarters of respondents are dissatisfied with the people running their institutions

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

As the country succeeds in attracting even more students from overseas, a mixture of demographics, ‘soft power’ concerns and local politics help explain its policy