Russell Group criticises student expansion plan

The Russell Group has attacked the government’s decision to abolish student number caps, warning of a potential decline in quality.

December 5, 2013

The group of 24 large research-intensive universities – which has traditionally lobbied for increases in the fee cap rather than expansion in numbers – issued a strongly critical press release.

The abolition of the cap, to happen by the 2015-16 year, was announced by George Osborne, the chancellor, in his autumn statement today.

The Treasury said following the speech that the expansion would cost £700 million a year and would be funded by the sale of pre-2012 income-contingent loans. The government expects the sale will raise £12 billion.

Wendy Piatt, director general of the Russell Group, said: “We have always said that quality higher education should be prioritised over quantity, especially in times of limited funding. We are therefore concerned that the government has chosen to put additional taxpayers’ money into growing student numbers so substantially.

“The government has said additional student numbers will be paid for through the sale of student loans but only time will tell if this sale will fully meet the costs of this expansion.”

Dr Piatt continued: “Providing higher education for everyone who wants it will require substantial long-term contributions from public funding and will present challenges for any future government that is unwilling or unable to continue to fund this. 

“Good teaching requires proper levels of investment and we are not yet convinced the government can deliver on its promise that the quality of provision will not suffer with such a significant expansion of numbers.”

The chancellor’s speech also contained a commitment to spend an extra £50 million a year on science, technology and engineering subjects, which Dr Piatt welcomed.

“But it is important that this money is for investment in existing STEM places and not simply new provision,” she added.

And she also warned it was “vital the announcement of further reductions to the BIS [Department for Business Innovation and Skills] budget for 2014-15 and 2015-16 does not lead to reductions in funding to universities for research, which pays long-term dividends for the economy”.

john.morgan@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

As GDP per capita rises more families can afford to move near to the better schools, which tends to raise demand for FE/HE, Advanced/Higher Apprenticeships etc. and thereby the need to plan for related places of study.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations